[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Deer Island’s odd-looking turbine is a testament to failure  

Credit:  By Scott Kirsner, Globe Correspondent | The Boston Globe | May 05, 2017 | www.bostonglobe.com ~~

If you’ve taken off from Logan Airport, you’ve probably seen the unusual white wind turbine on Deer Island – the one that looks a bit like a lollipop and stands apart from the two more traditional turbines that produce electricity for the water treatment plant there.

The turbine was planted in 2011 by Ogin Inc. as a demonstration of the company’s new technology. (Ogin, at the time, was known as FloDesign Wind Turbine.) Ogin said its “ducted” turbine – the duct refers to the ring of fiberglass that helps channel wind toward the blades – would extract more power from even gentle breezes. It also would be quieter and kill fewer birds. And because it was more compact than traditional turbines, you could fit more of them onto the same amount of land, generating more electricity.

Ogin raised more than $150 million in funding – even attracting the attention of former vice president Al Gore, a senior partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers, one of the company’s earliest backers. Late last month, the company entered receivership, and its assets are up for sale. Investors wrote their investment “down to nil,” as a press release from the New Zealand Super Fund, a government pension fund in New Zealand, put it.

Ogin was once the most promising wind energy startup in Massachusetts. The company attracted $3 million in grants and loans in 2010, during the administration of Governor Deval Patrick, and pulled in grant funding from the federal Department of Energy as well. As recently as 2013, Fast Company magazine ran an article headlined, “FloDesign’s Jet-Engine Turbine Will Change the Way You Think About Wind Power.”

What happened?

“We see this kind of thing periodically, where somebody says they have something better than conventional windmills,” says Paul Gipe, a renewable energy analyst and author of the book “Wind Energy for the Rest of Us.” “Usually, they’re crackpot inventors and they don’t get much beyond a fancy website. But one of the things that is different with Ogin is the sheer scale of the money wasted on this venture, and the names associated with it. That puts it in a different class.” Kleiner Perkins, for example, put money into Google, Genentech, and Amazon. (Kleiner Perkins partner Jan Van Dokkum took over as Ogin’s president in 2016, according to the company’s annual report; he didn’t respond to an interview request.)

One issue with ducted wind turbines is that while the fiberglass ring can direct more wind through the blades, “it creates a tremendous amount of drag on the device whenever wind is present,” Gipe says. That drag means that the tower that holds everything up has to be engineered to be sturdier – and more expensive – than your garden-variety tower. As a result, ducted turbines tend to stand less tall than conventional wind turbines, so they miss out on the brisker winds higher up. When I spoke to Lars Andersen, Ogin’s then-chief executive, in 2011, he spun one of the benefits of shorter towers as having “lower visual impact” on the landscape. That is, fewer complaining neighbors.

While the company made all kinds of revolutionary claims about its technology, when it came to actual proof points, “they were pretty light on what they would actually publish in the open literature,” says University of Massachusetts Amherst professor James Manwell, who has followed the company. Though Ogin asked him for an endorsement early on, Manwell says, “I never saw any evidence that it deserved an endorsement.”

“Their claims varied, depending on who they were talking to,” he says, adding, “They were clearly very good at raising money.” But Manwell and others point out that when startups try to sell wind technology, they find themselves competing with established players like General Electric, Vestas Wind Systems, and Siemens Wind Power. All those companies have proven the reliability and performance of their turbines over years in the real world; no startup has that track record.

To circumvent that brick wall, Ogin began acquiring land leases in California and negotiating its own power contracts with utilities. It set up a new venture, New Dimension Energy Co., to build and operate its own wind farms. The idea, says one former Ogin executive, who requested anonymity because of the terms of his separation from the company, was that Ogin “would take on the risk of installing the turbines, and once you have this successfully operating wind farm,” it would be acquired or could engineer a public offering. “It was kind of a go-big-or-go-home kind of thing,” the former executive says. The California plan “was the only thing that would really get thousands of turbines in the ground.”

But the plan didn’t work, and Ogin ran out of money. One of its biggest investors, the New Zealand Super Fund, lost about $38 million. Goldman Sachs, Canada’s Alberta Investment Management Corp., and the utility operator NRG also took a hit. Some of the Ogin technology has been acquired by Vestas, based in Denmark.

As part of the Commonwealth’s 2010 investment in Ogin, the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center lent the company $700,000 on the condition that it create 150 jobs. If Ogin hit that goal and maintained the jobs until 2015, the loan would’ve been forgiven. But the company peaked at about 115 people, most of whom have since been laid off. The loan “remains outstanding,” Clean Energy Center spokesman Craig Gilvarg said.

None of the current or former Ogin executives I contacted by phone and e-mail responded to requests for interviews, nor did founder Stanley Kowalski III, who is now chief executive of a startup in Wilbraham called FloDesign Sonics.

And about that turbine on Deer Island? It has turned into a kind of tombstone for Ogin. It hasn’t been producing electricity since February 2015. Last year, the company told the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, which runs the Deer Island water treatment facility, that “they planned to stop all plans to repair the unit and are not planning to upgrade it to the commercially-viable model as spelled out in their license agreement,” according to MWRA spokeswoman Ria Convery. Over nearly four years, the Ogin turbine produced about $6,000 worth of power and green energy credits that the MWRA can resell, Convery says. That didn’t compare well with the larger turbines on the island, which each produce about $100,000 of power and credits per year.

Rather than letting the Ogin turbine deteriorate, the MWRA would like it taken down. As Ogin’s assets are being sold off, it’s possible that the receiver might cover the cost – estimated at $350,000 to $400,000. But if something happens to render the turbine unsafe, like a big storm, it’s also possible that the MWRA might get stuck with the tab, an unfortunate situation for an agency that was willing to take a flier on a new technology.


[New bostonglobe.com title: What went wrong with the Deer Island wind turbine?] |

Source:  By Scott Kirsner, Globe Correspondent | The Boston Globe | May 05, 2017 | www.bostonglobe.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.