LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lincoln County wind vote could spark referendum 

Credit:  John Hult | Argus Leader | May 2, 2017 | www.argusleader.com ~~

The Lincoln County Commission voted to keep wind turbines at least a half mile from homes on Tuesday, setting up a push for a referendum by wind energy investors.

The 4-0 vote for a half-mile setback was the least restrictive of three options available to commissioners, but it was still too restrictive for Dakota Power Community Wind’s plans.

“We’ll take it to a vote,” said Brian Minish of DPCW.

Minish has said that a half mile setback would doom the project, initially envisioned as the largest in South Dakota.

Opponents of the wind project called the half-mile proposal an improvement over the current standard of three times the turbine height, but they’d pushed for a mile.

“It’s better than the ordinance we have now, but it isn’t adequate to protect the health and safety of the county,” said Winnie Peterson, director of We Care–SD, the Canton-based opposition group.

Investors and opponents have sparred over the county’s rules for wind siting for nearly three years.

Tuesday’s vote was the latest in a series of revisions, which includes limits on shadow flicker from spinning towers and volume restrictions that require steady volume of 45 decibels or less at property lines.

The planning commission initially endorsed a one-mile setback in October of 2016, but commissioners debated, then twice tabled, proposals for a half mile and three-quarters of a mile.

Commissioner Jim Schmidt had asked that the final vote be postponed for a week in order to set it for an evening meeting, but Commissioner Michael Poppens urged his fellow officials to cast a vote Tuesday morning.

Poppens said they’d heard plenty of testimony, and that both sides were anxious to see action taken.

“Delaying for a week is just delaying,” he said. “I don’t want to be part of a system that’s a system of delay,”

In order to bring a referendum on the setback issue, the wind project’s backers would need to gather 1,732 signatures within 20 days of the ordinance’s publication in the last of four legal newspapers in the county.

The vote would be open to the entire county, including all of Sioux Falls south of 57th Street.

Minish’s organization commissioned a poll from Public Opinion Strategies that showed a majority of Lincoln County voters supporting wind energy in all but one of the county’s commission districts.

Peterson balked at the sponsored poll, however, pointing to anti-project petitions circulated in 2015 as proof of its unpopularity in the area targeted for development.

She said Tuesday that the nonprofit plans to reach out to voters in Sioux Falls if the referendum effort is successful.

We Care–SD volunteer David Brouwer said it’s important for Lincoln County voters north of Canton to recognize that a less-restrictive ordinance leaves the door open to development in the entire county, including Sioux Falls, Tea, Harrisburg and Lennox.

“This affects everyone,” said Brouwer.

Source:  John Hult | Argus Leader | May 2, 2017 | www.argusleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon