LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No answers yet on wind farm 

Credit:  By Jim Dino | Standard-Speaker | April 10, 2017 | standardspeaker.com ~~

HUDSONDALE – How a proposed wind turbine farm that is ticketed for Broad Mountain will impact Packer Twp. won’t be known until a proposal is actually made, the township zoning officer said.

Martin Cichowic told the township supervisors Tuesday night he has received several phone calls relative to the wind turbine farm.

But he had no answers for callers, he said.

“There really is no true, concrete information at this point,” Cichowic said. “I have not had an application. There seems to be a lot of miscommunication. People have to understand this has to come together before anybody could truly understand what it is. I don’t know what the magnitude of the project is. Nobody knows how it is going to affect everybody. Until it is presented to us as an application, what is the truth?”

Four years ago, wind developer Jay Gartlan wanted to put wind turbines on the mountain, which is partially in the township and partially in Nesquehoning. But that application never went through because the applicant never paid the fees associated with it, Cichowic said.

Packer Twp. is forming an electrical cooperative with Nesquehoning in which the municipalities will buy their power in bulk, and the savings will go back to the communities rather than to a private company, like the companies that buy and sell power to customers.

Nesquehoning Borough Council President David Hawk confirmed he and fellow council members met with Gartlan earlier this year, and that Gartlan offered to be a power supplier once the cooperative is set up.

Last month, Packer Twp. Supervisor William Swinesburg said the potential wind farm has “nothing to do” with the power cooperative.

Source:  By Jim Dino | Standard-Speaker | April 10, 2017 | standardspeaker.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky