[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Invenergy hails benefits of wind energy; residents skeptical 

Credit:  By Dylan Johnson | Daily American | www.dailyamerican.com ~~

The atmosphere got heated again at another meeting about a potential new wind farm on Shaffer Mountain.

Representatives from Chicago-based wind company Invenergy gave a presentation at a Shade Township supervisors meeting Thursday to about 20 residents and environmental advocates.

In his presentation, Michael Kaplan, Invenergy vice president of business development, hailed wind farms as a benefit to communities by providing additional tax dollars, land leasing revenues and jobs.

He said Invenergy provided about $30 million in tax revenue and $43 million in landowner revenue throughout the country last year. He said 100 to 300 jobs would be added during construction, along with maintenance and upkeep positions if the wind farm is built.

Laura Jackson, president of Save Our Allegheny Ridges, was incredulous, however, saying that townships may not get as much money from wind turbine property taxes in Pennsylvania as they would in other states.

Kaplan answered, saying that the township could enter an agreement with Invenergy to receive more money.

“We’re not pretending we’re tax experts,” he said. “It’s up to the townships to decide whether or not that’s equitable for them.”

Supervisors Chairman John Topka cited tax figures from two wind farms in Shade Township. He said the township receives $254 per year from one farm and $4,315 from another. The county receives approximately five times that amount annually because the county’s taxes are higher.

“Shade Township only has 3 mills of taxes,” he said. “So that’s good for the residents but bad for us.”

Terry Doran, president of the Folmont Property Owners Association, said he is concerned that some houses in his area are not selling because of their proximity to wind turbines.

“I’ve seen no decrease in property taxes and no visible benefit of those turbines,” he said.

Shade Township landowner Joe Cominsky also said he has been unable to sell his land because of the possibility of wind turbines in the area.

“The market definitely has dried up for me,” he said. “I’ve already felt that bite.”

Environmental advocates voiced concerns for wildlife in the area, such as bats and hawks, that could be hit by turbine blades.

Tom Schuster, Sierra Club representative and Windber resident, said the club does not endorse any particular wind farm project, but it is generally in support of turbines because they kill 17 times fewer birds and bats than natural gas and other energy sources.

He also added that wind energy companies can kill between 40 and 90 percent fewer bats by curtailing blade speeds while only losing 1 percent of energy generation.

At least one resident said he is in favor of the wind turbines. Other residents asked supervisors to amend the township’s ordinance to further restrict the turbines.

Kaplan said the project is years away and has months of testing left before Invenergy will decide whether to build.

“We’re in the infancy of the project at this point. The first step is to begin collecting wind data to see if the project can be economically viable,” he said. “At this stage, we don’t know the size, or what type of turbines or even if there will be a project at all.

“Late this year we will begin to kick off environmental studies to see if a project can be built.”

Source:  By Dylan Johnson | Daily American | www.dailyamerican.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky