LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Xenophon team split on South Australia’s renewable energy targets 

Credit:  Michael Owen, Meredith Booth | The Australian | April 6, 2017 | www.theaustralian.com.au ~~

A high-profile prospective candid­ate for Nick Xenophon’s new SA Best party, set up to contest the next South Australian election, has sparked internal division by slamming “reckless” renewable energy targets that hurt business and make little difference to the environment.

Peter Humphries, a well-known lawyer in South Australia with a long association to Senator Xenophon, yesterday announced his nomination to represent SA Best as an upper house candidate at the state election due on March 17 next year.

But there was immediate divi­sion between Senator Xenophon’s prospective new star candidate and his “golden girl”, federal NXT MP Rebekha Sharkie, over energy policy.

The Xenophon party platform is for a 50 per cent renewable (electricity only) energy target by 2030.

As Mr Humphries argued against South Australia’s target of 50 per cent renewables by 2025, Ms Sharkie said she disagreed and stated that “myself and my team”, including Senator Xenophon, backed a 50 per cent target.

During interviews with ABC Radio and The Australian, Mr Humphries rubbished the Weatherill government’s “reckless rush to embrace alternative energy targets”. “This is really vanity politics, in my opinion, and the state pays the price,” he said. “The state has been devastated by the approach of this government to energy.”

The retired lawyer argued against Premier Jay Weatherill’s ambitio­n of taking an international leadership role on renewables and told The Australian the state’s renewables target was “bullshit”.

“The thing that annoys me is that it’s so bloody pointless. South Australia could turn off and nobod­y would notice,” Mr Humphries said. “South Australia is not going to save the world … China has 400-500 coal-fired power plants; we had two. Monty Python couldn’t make this stuff up.”

South Australia has a more than 40 per cent mix of renewable energy generation. Mr Weatherill was forced last month to release a $550 million “self-sufficient” energ­y plan that included temporary diesel generators and a new $360m gas-fired power plant to stabilise the wind-reliant grid.

But Ms Sharkie rejected Mr Humphries’s position, despite “some of the challenges” of wind power. “I can’t say that I think coal is the future,” she said.

“I think South Australia, Australia and what we’re seeing across Asia is many countries are now saying: ‘We’re going to take the lead on renewable energy, that coal is not good for humanity.’ ”

Senator Xenophon said last September that South Australia’s energy arrangements were a “textbook case” of how not to transition to renewable energy.

“I support the renewable energy­ target, but it’s how you achieve it … this has not been sensible, it has been reckless,” he said at the time.

Additional reporting: Maddison Reace

Source:  Michael Owen, Meredith Booth | The Australian | April 6, 2017 | www.theaustralian.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon