[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Opinions strong against Kossuth County wind ordinance  

Credit:  ALAN VAN ORMER Algona Upper Des Moines | March 21, 2017 | globegazette.com ~~

ALGONA | Despite, at times angry opinions during a public hearing, the Kossuth County Board of Supervisors passed the first reading of an ordinance that will regulate the construction and operation of commercial wind energy conversions systems.

The Board of Supervisors passed the second reading March 14. Both votes were 4-1 with Supervisor Don Besch voting no in each vote.

He said on Friday that there were several reasons for his decision including drainage, noise, loss of GPS systems and the way the turbines are taxed.

Besch said farmers have voiced opinions about wind turbines and the disruption they will cause drainage tiles. “If you don’t have drainage in Kossuth County, you don’t have a farm that is going to be productive,” he said during a phone interview March 17.

He also stressed his concern about tax credits for the wind energy companies. Besch said that the wind energy companies are receiving a tax credit of up to 30 percent of the cost of construction.

Besch also discussed the production tax credit, which would provide savings of 2.3 cents per kilowatt. “Industry standards for a 2 megawatt turbine producing an average of 6 million kilowatts per year is $150,000 per year per turbine,” he said. “If there are 250 turbines, that means $37.5 million of tax credits if putting out 6 million kilowatts per year.

“These are big numbers and they are getting big breaks from the federal government. The big rush is the federal government is putting an end to these tax credits soon,” Besch said. “My feeling is the wind energy companies are getting big tax credits. Do they need more breaks at the county level?”

He questioned how the county is going to spend the money. “It should be somewhere in the ordinance,” he said. “That is a big issue. I’m shocked that question isn’t asked more at these meetings.”

He also asked to put in the ordinance for farmers to be reimbursed if there are problems with drainage issues. That wasn’t included.

Besch was not alone in concerns with the wind conversion system ordinance adopted. At a public hearing at the first reading March 7, concerns were expressed about setback requirements, impact on property values, quality of life issues and making compromises for wind energy companies, but not property owners.

Joe Goche sent an email to the Board of Supervisors with different concerns. One dealt with the setbacks. His suggestion was to make all setbacks 1,600 feet and use the variance provisions to adjust.

“This will allow neighbors that do not want the systems a good separation distance and those that want the WECs the ability to develop with other likeminded neighbors to work together to minimize the footprint of the WECs project,” he said in the email.

He also suggested striking two paragraphs out of the ordinance. One deals with making sure that no changes are made once after a deal is completed. The second deals with making sure the ordinance protects citizens, property rights and values.

“A WECs company or any other company should not be allowed to change any ordinance without proper public notice,” he stated in the email. “The company should have to comply with the ordinances in place at the time of permit issuance. If the company cannot do this, it should relocate or adjust its construction plans to accommodate current ordinances that are in place to protect citizens and property rights and values.”

During the actual public hearing, Mick Schlievert, who lives at Oak Lake, said he hopes that the Board of Supervisors looked at both sides of the issue. “For those who build the windmills, it is going to be a positive windfall for them,” he said. “Have you considered the quality of life for the people who are going to live around these?”

He also asked if the Board of Supervisors had considered property and acreage owners. “(We) build out at Oak Lake for a quality of life,” Schlievert said. “It is an agricultural area. It is not an industrial area. These windmills are an industrial business.”

Source:  ALAN VAN ORMER Algona Upper Des Moines | March 21, 2017 | globegazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.