[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Town of Hopkinton passes wind turbine moratorium; councilman does not believe it will make a difference  

Credit:  By Matt Lindsey | North Country Now | March 21, 2017 | northcountrynow.com ~~

HOPKINTON – The Town of Hopkinton passed a moratorium on proposed wind turbines at a town board meeting March 20.

The moratorium was passed with a 2-1 vote, according to Town Councilman Steve Parker Jr.

Town council member Susan Lyon and Town Supervisor Susan Wood voted in favor while Parker voted against the moratorium.

Avangrid Renewable plans to erect 40 wind towers that are about 500 feet high on land in Hopkinton and Parishville.

Parker said two people abstained from the vote.

“The town supervisor only had a draft so she will get it to the clerk who will get it ready for review and to make official at the next meeting,” he said.

The moratorium is not official yet, according to Wood. She said she had emailed a lawyer and was awaiting answers. The moratorium will be discussed further at the next town board meeting April 10 at the town hall.

Meanwhile, the Town of Parishville voted down a moratorium March 10 despite concerns from locals. The unanimous vote came after community members spoke out against the proposed which have divided the community.

Parker was unsure if the moratorium would come at a cost to the Town of Hopkinton.

The moratorium would give more time for studies to be completed and information to be collected about wind towers.

Parker said it was the other council members “beliefs” that a moratorium would “buy the town some time” to further research the wind farm.

Parker disagreed with those feelings saying that “with the Article 10 process moving forward a moratorium would do no good.”

He said his understanding is that Article 10 would override local laws pertaining to renewable energy.

Large wind projects with a capacity to generate 25 megawatts (MW) or more are reviewed according to provisions of the Public Service Law Article 10 siting process.

Article 10 provides a review and approval process for major electric generating facilities in New York State by addressing state and local permitting requirements in a single process. It includes environmental justice and environmental and health requirements and ensures broad public involvement opportunities throughout the process.

Article 10 makes funds available to local municipalities through an Intervenor Fund so the community affected by the proposed plant can hire experts and lawyers and requires the creation of a Public Involvement Plan, summarizing project efforts to educate, inform, and involve the public in the permitting process.

The five stages of the Article 10 process are pre-application, application, administrative hearings, siting board decision and compliance.

Avangrid Renewable spokesperson Paul N. Copleman said benefits of wind towers include creating jobs and providing revenue for landowners and the rest of the community.

Based on projects in the past, Copleman believes the wind towers would lead to six permanent jobs and about 125 construction jobs likely lasting 12 to 18 months.

Copleman says revenue for landowners and farmers could be $500,000 and around $750,000 for the community.

Source:  By Matt Lindsey | North Country Now | March 21, 2017 | northcountrynow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch