[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

San Diego County will not pursue community choice in unincorporated areas 

Credit:  By Claire Trageser | KPBS | February 15, 2017 | www.kpbs.org ~~

The San Diego County Board of Supervisors will not move forward with an alternative energy program known as community choice aggregation.

The board voted Wednesday on a Comprehensive Renewable Energy Plan that has been in the works since 2013.

While the board voted unanimously to accept the plan, they did not vote to include one aspect of it, which was to do a study on whether community choice is feasible and cost effective. The study would have been the first step toward changing how unincorporated parts of the county get their energy, by skipping San Diego Gas & Electric and buying energy directly.

Supervisor Dianne Jacob made a motion to do the study, but she could not get a second, so the motion died. That meant Supervisors Kristin Gaspar, Greg Cox and Bill Horn were opposed to the study. Supervisor Ron Roberts was not at the meeting.

Jacob argued that the board would only be voting to study community choice, not committing to using the program.

“Doing the feasibility is the next step in at least seeing is this going to work or not,” she said. “I don’t understand what the fear is.”

But Gaspar said she didn’t want to rush ahead, but instead wait to see the results of a feasibility study being done by the city of San Diego.

“What’s the rush? Let’s get it right and not rushed,” she said. “When you’re ready to move forward and pull the trigger, that’s when you do the feasibility study.”

Cox echoed her comments, saying he is “open to the idea of (community choice), but doesn’t see the need to rush into something there would be a risk for.”

Horn objected to the cost of the study, which would have been $200,000.

“If climate change is bringing us all this rain, I’m all for it,” he added.

The supervisors voted instead to have county staff prepare a report in the next year on whether other cities and counties across the state should pursue community choice.

Other parts of the Comprehensive Renewable Energy Plan include establishing a sustainability task force; tracking solar and wind initiatives in the county; increasing the generation, transmission, use and storage of the county’s renewable energy; implementing an education and outreach strategy; and supporting legislation that benefits the county.

The county is also working on a climate action plan, which would lay out a goal for how much renewable energy it wants to use. The previous version of the plan was repealed after a lawsuit.

A draft of the new plan will come to the board by the end of this year.

What is community choice aggregation?

Right now, San Diego Gas & Electric provides power through its system of lines and wires to every city in San Diego County and southern Orange County. SDG&E buys the electricity from a variety of sources, including natural gas plants, hydroelectric dams and wind turbine farms.

If a city goes with community choice aggregation, power would still go through SDG&E’s grid, but the city would buy the energy, not the utility. That allows cities to have more control over how much of their energy comes from renewable sources and the cost for that electricity.

Source:  By Claire Trageser | KPBS | February 15, 2017 | www.kpbs.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon