[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

LEEDCo’s IceBreaker lake wind farm files for state permit 

Credit:  By John Funk, The Plain Dealer | February 02, 2017 | www.cleveland.com ~~

CLEVELAND – Icebreaker Windpower, Inc., the company created by Fred. Olsen Renewables, USA to build a pilot wind farm in the lake, has filed formal applications with the Ohio Power Siting Board.

The company is proposing to build a demonstration six-turbine wind farm in the lake about eight to 10 miles northwest of downtown at an estimated cost of $126 million.

Each of the six turbines will be slightly larger but much more powerful than the one at Lincoln Electric near Interstate 90. From shore they will appear to be about the size of half a dime on the horizon.

The farm will have a total generating capacity of 20.7 megawatts, small by power plant standards but large enough to prove the concept that lake-based turbines can be built here and can stand up to lake currents and ice floes.

The application and its 13 supporting exhibits containing test results and engineering analyses is nearly 1,900 pages long.

The documents cover everything from the environmental impact of the construction to the farm’s impact on birds, bats and aquatic species, to the engineering supporting the construction of the turbine platforms and the buried cable that will deliver the power from the farm to a Cleveland Public Power substation (popularly called the “whale building”) just north of the Innerbelt.

Icebreaker hopes to win approval from the siting board this summer, though opponents could alter that schedule if they retain lawyers and formally intervene to oppose the application.

The siting board has already held an informal public meeting here about the project. The agency will now schedule at least one formal public hearing here to take testimony for and against the project. A court reporter will make a formal record of the hearing.

As in any regulatory case, the siting board has already begun accepting written comments from the public in the case.

Icebreaker has permit applications pending with the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the U.S. Coast Guard. The federal agencies held a joint public meeting on the project last fall.

The DOE has awarded the project $50 million, deliverable in a series of small grants as the company meets the agency’s timetable, design requirements and environmental assessments. So far, the DOE has invested about $10 million in the project, said David Karpinsi, vice president of operations for LEEDCo.

Fred. Olsen Renewables USA is preparing to buy LEEDCo’s intellectual assets (think environmental impact assessments and other studies). Fred. Olsen has already paid for geological testing of the lake bed and other impact studies demanded by regulators.

LEEDCo was incorporated as a non-profit in 2009 to seek federal funding and begin a search for off-shore wind turbine engineering companies and contractors, turbine suppliers and companies capable of doing environmental and biological impacts of the projects.

The project’s roots go back to 2005 when the Cleveland Foundation and Cuyahoga County created and funded a task force to explore the idea that building lake-base turbines could serve as a way to create a wind turbine manufacturing center here for all of the Great Lakes.

Federal studies show that the “best winds” in Ohio for wind turbines occur over the lake.

Fred. Olsen Renewables, USA, a subsidiary of Oslo, Norway-based Fred. Olsen Renewables, hopes eventually to build hundreds of turbines in the lake, said CEO David Brunt.

Fred. Olsen Renewables is the largest independent power producer in the United Kingdom and the fifth largest in Europe.

In an earlier interview, Brunt said Lake Erie has the long-term potential generating capacity of about five gigawatts of electricity. That’s roughly equal to the output capacity of five large nuclear power plants.

The siting board application is careful to point out that at this time the company has no plans to build additional turbines at the site.

The project’s mono bucket foundations were developed in Europe for wind farms in the North Sea. The foundations are designed to work their way into the sea or lake bottom without pile driving. The giant steel buckets will be fabricated here.

MHI Vestas Offshore Wind, based in Denmark, will supply the ocean-tested turbines.

IceBreaker anticipates hiring hundreds of people when construction begins in the summer of 2018 and has been working with the Cleveland-based Great Lakes Wind Network to find subcontractors and workers now.

The LEEDCo website the the GLWN website are continuing to offer early registration. LEEDCo held a well-attended meeting in December to explain to contractors, engineering firms and other companies what it will take to bid for the work.

Once built, the wind farm will require just 28 employees, according to LEEDCo, which will result in $1.6 million in wages and $6.7 million in “total economic output” annually.

Each of the turbines can generate up to 3.45 megawatts (3,450,000 watts). The farm is expected to operate 8,200 hours per year, meaning about 41.4 percent of the time. The farm is expected to generate a total of about 75,000 megawatt-hours per year.

Cleveland Public Power has agreed to take 25 percent of the total. Another 30 percent will go to various municipal power companies served by American Municipal Power. Formal contracts are pending. Cuyahoga County has agreed to purchase about 8 percent of the output. The rest of the electricity will flow into the regional high-voltage grid.

Because the total megawatt output of the wind farm is relatively small, it is not expected to have a noticeable impact on customer bills.

Source:  By John Funk, The Plain Dealer | February 02, 2017 | www.cleveland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon