[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind plan returns to committee  

Credit:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | January 10, 2017 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Highland councillors are being urged to reject a Caithness windfarm plan – despite the possibility of a potentially costly appeal from a spurned developer.

Infinergy hopes to build 24 turbines up to 456ft on the Limekiln Estate at Reay – an area with a high proliferation of towers.

While Scottish Governmnent ministers will make the final decision, planning officials have recommended that councillors raise no objection.

Public objections have ranged from “visual blight” and “loss of wild land” to the “questionable need” for more turbines.

Councillors rejected an initial planning application. Ministers echoed that after a public inquiry. The committee will today consider a revised submission.

Seasoned industry watcher Stuart Young has reminded it that hundreds of constituents oppose the scheme.

He believes the planners’ recommendation is “almost certainly influenced by a desire not to incur the cost of another public inquiry.”

Mr Young claims the Limekiln scheme “is simply not required.”

Industry data shows that the neighbouring Baillie and Strathy North windfarms alone have received £5.1million for switching turbines off to balance the national grid in the six years that compensation has been paid.

Local objector Brenda Herrick, who is fighting a plethora of other schemes planned for the county, said: “They’re all near the NorthCoast500 tourist route, which is in danger of becoming ‘turbine alley’.”

Fiona Milligan of Infinergy dismissed all the objections.

She said: “A material consideration in assessing this case was the report issued following the public inquiry. It clearly stated that in all respects other than the issue of wild land, where further assessment was required, ministers found the scheme would ‘not give rise to any detrimental impacts, either singly or cumulatively, sufficient to outweigh the benefits’.”

She said constraint payments were granted across the entire energy generating sector and that a 2016 report by economic consultants concluded there was no evidence to show windfarms have an adverse effect on tourism.

Source:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | January 10, 2017 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.