[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Thoughts on those wind turbines  

Credit:  By LEE HULM | Norfolk Daily News | January 7, 2017 | norfolkdailynews.com ~~

Yes, areas known as the “wind belt” in both South Dakota and Nebraska are a tempting target (no pun intended) for turbines promising lucrative pay-offs for landowners (upon whose land the structures would be erected), as well as tax moneys for local communities and counties struggling to finance a laundry list of public services.

Consequently, it’s “the goose that laid the golden egg” from a financial standpoint.

That helps to explain why, back in 2009, a large number of farmers and ranchers owning property in Tripp, Perkins and Ziebach counties in South Dakota where l grew up were quick to sign up, or to first take contract offers to their attorneys for analysis and advice.

For me, the opportunity amounted to a paradox of sorts – with the proposed payout for a two-megawatt turbine a hefty $12,000 per year (multiplied by 15 or 16 turbines per 640-acre section) on one hand, versus the not-so-appealing prospect of an unaesthetic landscape (they stood 356 feet high on a 56-foot diameter base, and had three 112-foot blades) on the other.

The money kept whispering in my ear, “take me, take me” – attempting to divert my attention from other worthy considerations – like the potential effect on wildfowl, the necessity to build access roads, the availability of overhead transmission lines, the need to construct underground transformers, and the securing of easements across neighboring property.

Also of consequence was the question of the ultimate beneficiary from the power generated (not that China or other foreign entities were on my mind at the time).

Would it serve the needs of local communities and the state, or would it be transferred elsewhere, possibly even out of the country? Of course, although I was aware that President Obama wanted 25 percent of the nation’s electricity created by solar power and wind in the next 10 years, and had earmarked $42 billion in stimulus money for expanding it, l managed to dismiss that incongruity summarily – given the by then well established disconnect existing between politics and common sense.

Anyway, the decision eventually came down to being true to my roots.

First, the windmills that I knew growing up still provide a bittersweet yearning for things of the past that remain dear to our heritage – independence, imagination, harmony with nature, and a lack of pretense. Given the gift of sensory perception, the old windmills could reveal a lot about the folks who came and went. (Will turbines ever do that?)

Second, the land was homesteaded by my grandparents back in 1907 over 110 years ago. No one but family has ever lived there – except for Native Americans who regularly camped along Thunder Butte Creek in centuries prior.

Word has it that both Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull and their followers frequented the scene. A peaceful, relaxed and secluded life-sustaining spot? By all means!

In the end, the presence of turbines seemed like an unwelcome intrusion disrespecting the traditions of our ancestors. And, the spectre of haunting visits from disappointed spirits held scant appeal; hence, my conscience dictated the choice, which is always a good thing!

Source:  By LEE HULM | Norfolk Daily News | January 7, 2017 | norfolkdailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.