[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Planning commission votes to hold public meeting on wind rules  

Credit:  By Travis Weik | The Courier-Times | December 22, 2016 | www.thecouriertimes.com ~~

The Henry County Planning Commission decided during last week’s meeting it will consider recommendations about wind turbine setbacks at a future meeting.

Some local residents are upset that wind turbines came up at the most recent meeting at all. The agenda for Thursday’s meeting contained end of the year business and did not include anything about turbines or county regulations about their construction.

Commission member Steve Dugger made a motion at the end of the meeting that would allow the planning commission to legally talk about changes to the local wind energy conversion system (WECS) ordinance.

“There actually was no discussion about wind,” said Henry County Zoning Administrator Darrin Jacobs.

Jacobs pointed out that any member of the Henry County Planning Commission has the ability to bring a motion to the floor at any time, even if it is not on the agenda.

Once Dugger made the motion to amend the WECS ordinance, county attorney Sean Row stopped any of the commission members from discussing the merits of the ordinance or wind turbines in any way. These items were not on the posted agenda.

“No substantive discussion took place Thursday night,” Row said.

Row said that this was a “purely procedural” motion that had to be followed if the planning commission didn’t want to open itself up to legal challenges. The steps outlining how the commission goes about amending an ordinance are listed in Indiana Code 36-7-4-606.

Row explained that in order to change any ordinances, or even talk about changing the ordinance, the planning commission must first hold a public hearing.

At such a meeting, members of the public will be able to speak for or against the proposed changes, Row said. Representatives of government entities will also have a chance to publicly weigh in on any amendments before the planning commission makes their vote.

Row pointed out that the Henry County Planning Commission can also vote at the public hearing to modify the committee’s recommendations.

This is the same procedure that the Henry County Planning Commission would have to follow if they wanted to tweak the county comprehensive plan or add a rule that all voting members had to wear checkered suspenders to meetings.

The amendments in question are the end result of the WECS Committee Henry County set up this summer.

The WECS Committee voted in November to recommend the planning commission amend Henry County’s ordinance to state that industrial wind turbines be set no closer than 1.1 times the height of the tower from non-participating property lines and 1,250 feet from non-participating dwellings.

“There was no vote on that motion,” Jacobs said. “Nothing changed … Nothing has been decided.”

The only legal action that the planning commission could take was to vote on whether or not to conduct a public meeting about the amendments, Jacobs said.

The commission voted 5-4 to give president Steve Rust permission to schedule a public hearing about amendments to the WECS ordinance, with Mike Roach, Olene Veach, Randy Jones and Joe Mannis voting against. Jacobs said Rust has the discretion of when to schedule the public hearing.

If the vote had failed Thursday, the motion would have died on the floor.

The Courier-Times will publish the date of the upcoming public hearing as soon as it is available.

Source:  By Travis Weik | The Courier-Times | December 22, 2016 | www.thecouriertimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.