[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Conservancy didn’t explicitly support Antrim Wind, by Mark Zankel  

Credit:  The Keene Sentinel | December 12, 2016 | www.sentinelsource.com ~~

The beginning of N.H. Site Evaluation Committee deliberations about the proposed Antrim Wind project is placing media and public focus on the project. That’s a good thing, as there are many important issues and considerations connected to this proposal.

However, a recent piece in The Sentinel (“State to begin deliberating on Antrim wind project today,” Dec. 7) misstates The Nature Conservancy in New Hampshire’s position on the project.

Our organization has not, as was suggested in the piece, come out “in support of the project.” Last spring, the conservancy submitted formal comments about the proposal to the SEC. These comments reflected extensive review by our science staff, policy team and board of trustees, and examined those committee criteria for which the conservancy had knowledge, expertise and standing.

While our review identified various impacts on the natural landscape, we concluded that these impacts were not unduly adverse based on the factors state statute and regulation require the committee to consider. Additionally, we found the project to be in alignment with New Hampshire’s state energy policy.

The conservancy did not make an overall recommendation for or against Antrim Wind because The SEC is required to consider many factors, such as community input, that are beyond our expertise or purview.

Evaluating the benefits and impacts of energy projects is rarely black-and-white. The conservancy has sought to provide input in a way that honors our mission and our science-based approach while adding value to the site review and respecting the perspectives of other stakeholders.


State Director

The Nature Conservancy

22 Bridge St., 4th Floor


Source:  The Keene Sentinel | December 12, 2016 | www.sentinelsource.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.