[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Inquiry gets underway into controversial plans for two north Norfolk wind turbines  

Credit:  Miles Jermy | Eastern Daily Press | 22 November 2016 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

Opposing sides made their case at the opening of a public inquiry into controversial plans to erect two wind turbines near Holt.

Genatec is seeking permission to build a 66m turbine at Pond Farm, Bodham.

Plans for a wind turbine up to 78m tall on land at Selbrigg Farm, Hempstead have been submitted by Selbrigg Generation.

Both applications have gone to appeal after they were rejected by North Norfolk District Council (NNDC) last year.

The inquiry, which is expected to last more than a week, is being heard by planning inspector John Braithwaite at the council’s Cromer HQ.

Speaking at the start of the inquiry today barrister for NNDC Estelle Dehon said: “The harmful impact of each turbine on its own is sufficient to justify refusal of each invidual appeal. When viewed cumulatively, the case redoubles, particularly given that the turbines will both be visible from certain key points in the landscape and in settings of certain important heritage assets.”

Ashley Bowes, for NOTTT, which is campaigning against the Bodham application, argued that the proposed wind turbine was in conflict with the local development plan.

He said the turbine would have a damaging impact on heritage buildings including Baconsthorpe Castle and Barningham Hall and interfere with the operation of a nearby police mast.

David Hardy for Genatec described the Bodham windturbine as a “small scale development” and argued that if only one application was approved it should be Pond Farm.

Paul Maile, representing Selbrigg Generation, argued that the turbine would have no significant affect on the nearby North Norfolk Coast area of outstanding beauty.

Source:  Miles Jermy | Eastern Daily Press | 22 November 2016 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.