[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind is not green, clean, sustainable, renewable 

Credit:  By Skip Lisle, Grafton Select Board member, Wildlife biologist | The Chester Telegraph | Oct 31, 2016 | www.chestertelegraph.org ~~

Industrial wind developments – IWDs – in Vermont are often described as “green,” “clean,” “sustainable,” and “renewable.”

This falsely implies that they can eliminate enough fossil fuel use to influence the world’s climate and that they are otherwise harmless.

Most of Vermont’s faint carbon footprint is from transportation and heating. Only about 5 percent is from electricity use.

IWDs can only reduce that number by a fraction. This is partly because our wind resource is relatively poor. The grid also requires constancy. The intermittent pulses from wind have to be balanced by steady sources like carbon-emitting gas plants.

Wind energy sent out of state

Moreover, Vermont can’t count most of this wind energy toward our arbitrary self-sufficiency goals because it will be sold out-of-state as “renewable” credits.

This weak blow against carbon, combined with related environmental costs, suggests IWDs are green in name only.

This symbolic “greening” requires actual de-greening.

Modern turbines are colossal. In low-wind sites, they are even larger: Roughly 500-feet tall with a blade-sweep diameter considerably longer than a football field.

In Vermont, they are built on mountaintops. Their massive foundations are made by leveling bedrock, pouring cement and adding gravel trucked in from miles around.

Enormous roads, which traverse and fragment the forested landscape, are necessary to transport turbine components and assembly cranes to their destinations.

This infrastructure eliminates cool, sponge-like, sediment-holding, carbon-sequestering and chemical-free forest.

It becomes an open, largely un-vegetated source of local warming for the ground, air, and headwater streams. The impervious, manmade substrate increases run-off, erosion, and sedimentation rates. In border areas, plants are controlled with herbicides.

This symbolic greening requires us to develop high-altitude mountains. To list just a few of their values, they are:

  • Refugia for wildlife that shy from heavy human activities;
  • “native” sanctuaries from the exotic, ecosystem-changing plantscommon in valleys and along roads;
  • the places where pure, cold-water ecosystems begin;
  • sites of critical habitats like stands of bear-nourishing beech trees; and
  • great locales to hunt and hike.

Just above, where turbine blades spin, are flyways for birds, bats and insects. Once degraded, these ecosystems and animals will not be renewable.

This symbolic greening requires us to alter our world-famous viewscape. Rural beauty, or the general lack of development, is a characteristic that survives chiefly in our mountains.

Perhaps, it’s best exemplified by the undulating ridgelines and the stunning skylines they form. Cherished by Vermonters, these qualities also provide the foundation of our beauty-based economy. If lost, these values will, by definition, not be sustained.

Human sacrifice

This symbolic greening requires human sacrifice. When running, turbines broadcast audible noise and far-reaching, inaudible and health-degrading infrasound.

Vermont towns typically have widely dispersed populations. When IWDs are crammed into them, there invariably will be people living so close to turbines they will lose property value and, possibly, their health.

Naturally, these potential victims tend to fight proposed IWDs. Conversely, people living safely on the other side of town, and lobbied hard by the wind industry, are more tempted to accept this threat to their neighbors.

This dynamic creates harmful social climate change. Once damaged, these priceless commodities, lives and communities may not be renewable.

IWDs hurt our environment while doing nothing for the world’s. If we want to make a real difference – and put nobody at risk – we should drive less, insulate more and embrace domestic solar.

Even better, we could simply not develop our unspoiled mountains. This would protect Vermont’s wonderful environment of rich natural habitats, physical beauty, quaint villages, and close-knit communities.

Source:  By Skip Lisle, Grafton Select Board member, Wildlife biologist | The Chester Telegraph | Oct 31, 2016 | www.chestertelegraph.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon