[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Time to say no to wind  

Credit:  Smith: Time to say no to wind | Annette Smith | Rutland Herald | October 30,2016 | www.rutlandherald.com ~~

For a period of several years in the early 2000s I compiled news story lists on Vermont environmental issues. I did it for my own purposes and also as a service provided to others. Many people in the environmental community subscribed to my free frequent news story lists, organized by topic such as agriculture, energy, solid waste, groundwater and surface water. Whatever was in the news, the historian in me (B.A., Vassar College in contemporary European history, 1977) archived it.

I do not recall when I stopped compiling the news stories, but I remember why. Energy news. Wind news. So many articles, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor appeared so frequently that it became nearly impossible to keep up with. At the time, wind energy was raging in Manchester and just surfacing in Londonderry. It is typical of the discussions that are being repeated in too many rural Vermont communities ever since.

Among those articles is a commentary I wrote promoting wind energy. I confess I knew nothing about wind energy at the time. It sounded like a good idea.

Fourteen years ago, the cast of characters was a little different, but not by much. David Blittersdorf, past president of the American Wind Energy Association and founding member and past chairman of Renewable Energy Vermont, appears as a wind developer. The name Blittersdorf occurs 10 times in that batch of news stories. Sabina Haskell was managing editor of the Manchester Journal and is now on the board of the Burlington Electric Commission. Andy Perchlik was the executive director of Renewable Energy Vermont and is now director of the Department of Public Service’s Clean Energy Development Fund. Dave Gram reported on the topic for The Associated Press in 2002, as he does now.

I spend too much of my time these days digging up files from old computers to answer the questions of people in new communities learning about a new wind project proposed for their area. Heads up, Bolton, you’re next. Seven big wind turbines.

In 2015, I turned on the old computer, this time for the people in Swanton, and found the legislation drafted in 2010 to establish wind turbine noise standards with setbacks and/or decibel levels. In December 2015, I met with House Speaker Shap Smith and put a copy of the 2010 legislation on his desk, along with a copy of Sen. John Rodgers’ just-introduced legislation calling for a ban on big wind turbines in Vermont. I told Speaker Smith that Rep. Tony Klein, chairman of the House Natural Resources and Energy Committee, refused to take up the 2010 legislation, arguing that “you people don’t want standards, you just want to ban them, so why don’t you be honest.”

So, I said, “take your pick, we don’t care which: setbacks, noise decibel levels, a ban, can we please have the conversation? How are we going to move forward on renewable energy and siting?” House Speaker Smith said, “We’re not.”

And that is how the conversation about Vermont wind energy has gone for 14 years.

The wind industry in Vermont – which presents itself now as Spanish Avangrid/Iberdrola Renewables, Chittenden County’s David Blittersdorf, and enabling utilities and government agencies – has not changed its tune: People don’t like to look at them, there are no other issues. The wind industry’s consistent denial of problems is how proponents ridicule critics and dismiss their concerns.

Community responses have expanded, especially as acoustically complex noise pollution becomes part of the real world experience.

When I am asked to give talks about wind energy, I dig out the two-page document I created years ago called “Wind Issues.” It is a menu of the issues surrounding wind energy that Vermonters raise in public meetings as they do their own research. Solar energy, by comparison, has a short list of issues. Yes, there are issues. But wind energy has a huge number of issues, all magnified when wind turbines are built on Vermont’s ridgelines in our quiet, rural communities. The more Vermonters learn, the more opposed they become.

How can we move forward on wind energy? We can’t.

Let’s stop fooling ourselves by continuing conflict and enriching a handful of already-wealthy individuals and corporations. Their claims of getting off foreign fossil fuels and creating jobs while saving the planet are not supported by facts. Let’s enable progress toward locally distributed renewable energy by taking big wind off the table.

We can move forward with renewable energy for Vermonters, and right now our best resource is solar. Vermonters want renewable energy that we can live with, constructed in our communities to serve our homes, businesses and industry. That means building next to load, building projects that serve our communities locally and retiring the renewable energy credits. And it means that the profiteers must become collaborators while the politicians must restore and respect our democracy.

Annette Smith is executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment Inc. She is also a member of the Danby Planning commission and the Rutland Regional Planning Commission.

Source:  Smith: Time to say no to wind | Annette Smith | Rutland Herald | October 30,2016 | www.rutlandherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.