[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Federal judge dismisses nuisance case against Kingfisher wind farm  

Credit:  By Paul Monies | The Oklahoman | October 13, 2016 | newsok.com ~~

A federal judge has dismissed an anticipatory nuisance case brought by a group of landowners worried about the noise and health effects of the Kingfisher wind farm.

U.S. District Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti said the seven landowners and the Oklahoma Wind Action Association failed to show evidence of harm in their claim for anticipatory nuisance and a permanent injunction against the development.

The lawsuit was filed in 2014, before the 149-turbine project began construction. The wind farm began some operations last year, and became fully operational in March. It is owned by First Reserve Corp. and operated by Apex Clean Energy Inc.

In his order, DeGiusti said the alleged harms over shadow flicker and infrasound presented by the group and its experts was “speculative at best.” He also said aesthetic concerns without any significant evidence of adverse health effects were not enough to constitute a nuisance.

“At this late stage of the litigation, after a full opportunity to conduct discovery and marshal evidence, the injuries cited by plaintiffs are simply too speculative to constitute harm sufficient under the anticipatory nuisance theory,” DeGiusti wrote.

The landowners and association wanted an injunction that would move turbines at least 1.72 miles (9,082 feet) from the homes of landowners who didn’t lease to Kingfisher Wind LLC. The $450 million wind farm covers 11,000 acres in Canadian and Kingfisher counties.

“In the face of plaintiffs’ speculative evidence of injury from the KWP (Kingfisher Wind Project), the enormous cost and delay associated with the relief sought by plaintiffs strongly militates against an injunction here, and compels the clear conclusion that the balance of hardships here does not tip in plaintiffs’ favor,” DeGiusti wrote.

Neither side was immediately available for comment on DeGiusti’s ruling.

Court documents show none of the landowners’ homes are within a 1,500-foot setback recommended by the turbine manufacturer. The homes are between 2,000 feet and 10,385 feet from the nearest wind turbine.

A state law passed last year says wind turbines cannot be closer than 1.5 nautical miles (9,100 feet) from a school, hospital or airport. The law, which went into effect in November, does not mention homes.

Electricity from the Kingfisher wind farm is sold to Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., which has an agreement to resell it to Florida utility Gulf Power Co.

Source:  By Paul Monies | The Oklahoman | October 13, 2016 | newsok.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.