[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No advantage to Vermont 

Credit:  Brattleboro Reformer | 10/02/2016 | www.reformer.com ~~

Teddy Roosevelt set aside the national forests for the use of all of the citizens of this great country. He did it, because he saw that big business was moving in to despoil the wilderness and make money off what he, rightly, saw as a public commons.

For decades the governors of Vermont have refused to let private corporations profit from our commonly held land. Shumlin has allowed a Spanish conglomerate (Avangrid, AKA Iberdola) to make a huge profit off of our forest land. He has done this in the name of renewable energy for Vermont. Shumlin wants Vermont to play its part in decreasing global warming. But is this really the way to do it?

Vermont’s contribution to decreasing global warming is its stewardship of its forestland. Its trees and streams act as a sponge for carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. In contrast, razing the forest, paving the ridge lines, and putting in immense concrete footings destroys the carbon sequestration of the forest cover forever, and requires an immense amount of carbon emitting machinery. What is green about this activity?

Shumlin says that the wind energy is green and helps Vermont. Well, not exactly. First, the carbon footprint used to create an industrial wind farm would take many decades to pay off in wind generation. Second, the Vermont electric grid cannot accept this extra generating capacity and has no batteries with which to store it. Third, the credits that come to the state as a result of having wind generation, are being sold to other states, so they don’t have to create green energy themselves. What is wrong with this picture?

There is no advantage to Vermont in this activity. We lose our forest. We create more carbon dioxide. We get no more electricity coming into our grid. Who benefits? Iberdola. Their benefit comes in huge federal tax breaks. This is your money and my money going to a Spanish conglomerate. Shumlin has gained some contributions to his campaigns, past and future. We have lost something precious and irretrievable. The word immoral comes to mind. As Fish would say, “What the hell is up with that?”

Sally Warren and Susie Peters, Grafton and Saxtons River, Sept. 22

Source:  Brattleboro Reformer | 10/02/2016 | www.reformer.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky