[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial power line scheme through Moray countryside could level 6,600 acres of woodland  

Credit:  3 October 2016 by David Mackay | The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Forestry chiefs and an energy giant are on a collision course over controversial plans to build a power line through the Moray countryside.

Building the 14-mile link from the Dorenell wind farm to the Blackhillock substation near Keith is expected to involve felling more than 6,600 acres of woodland.

The local authority has already questioned why cables cannot be buried underground and Marine Scotland has raised fears about the impact on fish in nearby rivers.

The new line would ultimately connect the turbines scheme south-west of Dufftown to the National Grid.

But Forestry Commission Scotland has delivered a scathing verdict on Scottish and Southern Energy Networks’ (SSEN) proposals.

The agency has made seven recommendations and highlighted 12 areas for further discussion in a letter to the Scottish Government, which will decide the fate of the plans.

The Forestry Commission has raised concerns about the lack of tree replanting offered by SSEN and the impact on the economy.

There are also worries the width of the corridor of woodland which will have to be levelled exceeds national guidelines, with no justification.

SSEN has already faced calls to consider running the cables underground – including from Moray MSP Richard Lochhead – but insists the move would be too costly.

Last night a Dufftown bed and breakfast owner also raised the spectre of tourists being put off returning to the area to enjoy its natural beauty as the power line would pass within a mile of the village.

Alistair Jeffs said: “The reason people come here is to enjoy the view. Yes, whisky is a big draw but while they are here most of our guests go walking.

“This is going to desecrate our woodland. There’s been a gradual chipping away at the landscape with developments.

“Power lines could be one of the worst because they stretch so far. It’ll get to the point where people won’t come back.

“I think underground cables are worth the small extra cost on our electricity bills. If it means preserving the area and encouraging people to go walking on the Cabrach then it’s a price worth paying.”

Ian Cowe, development officer for the Forestry Commission in Grampian, called for “rapid discussion” with SSEN to address the issues.

He said: “Scotland’s woodlands and forestry are an economic, as well as environmental, asset. There is a strong presumption in favour of protecting Scotland’s woodland resources.

“A new power line can achieve significant public benefit, but Forestry Commission Scotland expects that when transmission companies identify route corridors, they aim to minimise environmental impact and where feasible avoid areas of woodland and forestry.

“The location of high value woodland to be permanently removed should be mapped and detailed justification for any woodland removal should be produced.”

Mr Cowe warned he Forestry Commission could not recommend the project for approval in its current form.

Engineers will use a helicopter to drop 135 of the 78ft electric poles into position to carry the cables to the 59-turbine windfarm, which is due to be completed in 2018.

A spokesman for SSEN said the firm had held detailed discussions with Forest Enterprise Scotland before submitting the application.

He said: “We understand that the conservancy division of Forestry Commission Scotland, which is responsible for forestry and woodland-related policy, was not aware of these discussions until formal consultation took place on our application.

“Members of our project team have met the relevant officials to discuss our proposals, and we are developing design amendments which we are confident will address the issues raised.”

Source:  3 October 2016 by David Mackay | The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.