LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents call for stricter wind farm regulations in nuisance complaint case 

Credit:  By Crystal Price | Sep 29, 2016 | www.koco.com ~~

A group of residents from Canadian and Kingfisher counties have filed a nuisance complaint against an Oklahoma wind farm.

The residents said the wind turbines were built too close to their homes and they have become an unwanted nuisance.

Cheyenne Ward moved to the area six years ago for the peace and quiet.

However, she said since wind turbines have gone up it has been difficult for her family to sleep.

“It’s very loud, it’s like a swooshing sound,” Ward said. “A lot of times it sounds like you live at an airport.”

The wind turbines are part of a project by the company, Kingfisher Wind, to put up 149 wind turbines in Canadian and Kingfisher counties.

In 2014, Ward and six other residents filed a nuisance complaint trying to stop turbines from going in, but she said the company built them anyway.

Now the residents are back in court asking that some of the wind turbines be removed.

“We would like to see some regulations made for setbacks, we’re asking 2 miles from property lines,” Ward said.

If the judge allows the case to go to trial, some turbines could have to be removed.

“We’re not saying that we want to get rid of wind farms, we just want to see something done to protect the people that live here,” Ward said.
The judge is expected to make a ruling on this case at a later date.

The attorney for Kingfisher Wind said he had no comment on the case at this time.

Source:  By Crystal Price | Sep 29, 2016 | www.koco.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon