[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Residents want Dutton Dunwich wind farm project cancelled  

Credit:  Ontario energy: Residents want Dutton Dunwich wind farm project cancelled | Cancel Dutton Dunwich wind project: Tory MPP | By Jennifer Bieman, St. Thomas Times-Journal | Wednesday, September 28, 2016 | www.lfpress.com ~~

With Ontario abruptly suspending plans to buy more green power, a Southwestern Ontario MPP and a fired-up group of anti-turbine advocates are pushing the Liberal government to also scrap a hotly contested wind farm imposed on a rural township that voted overwhelmingly against it.

The opposition of 84 per cent of Dutton Dunwich residents wasn’t enough to stop the Strong Breeze Wind Farm – the 57.5 megawatt project by Chicago-based energy giant Invenergy that got the green light from regulators in March.

Now, with the Liberal government’s surprise move Tuesday to back away from signing another $3.8 billion in green energy deals, Elgin-Middlesex-London PC MPP Jeff Yurek and the Dutton Dunwich Opponents of Wind Turbines (DDOWT) are urging the province to renege on the contentious contract.

“For projects that haven’t started yet, they should take a look, especially with Dutton Dunwich. Cancel the contracts for energy we don’t need and can’t afford,” said Yurek.

“They’re not willing hosts, so to me it makes sense to end the contract for energy that is being over-produced in this province.”

Yurek said the approval process for the Strong Breeze project was unjust and deeply flawed.

After the controversial contract was awarded, Dutton Dunwich residents learned six Ontario First Nations communities – one near Hudson Bay, one close to the Manitoba border and all more than 1,000 kilometres away – helped give the proposal a boost with the Independent Electricity System Operator.

“It was a stretch by the government to make it a check box on the contract. I think they should have looked at the local First Nations groups. It should be a local decision,” he said.

Though the Strong Breeze Wind Farm was rubber stamped during the first phase of Ontario’s Large Renewable Procurement (LRP) process – and the government has only vowed to suspend the second phase – Yurek wants the Liberals to take further action.

“They’re now realizing the province has an energy crisis that they’ve created and they need to do something about it,” he said.

“The green energy contracts they were signing are unaffordable and putting a halt to signing any further ones is a good start.”

For DDOWT’s members, the government’s plan to stop green energy investment only months after losing the fight to keep Invenergy’s wind farm out feels like another blow.

“This would seem to make logical sense to us for our government to put a stop to this project as well and other ones where they weren’t wanted,” said Bonnie Rowe, spokesperson for the DDOWT.

“There’s still very strong community opposition out there.” Rowe said

Invenergy hasn’t broken ground yet and still need a renewable energy approval from the province before they can begin construction. Though the ink is dry on the Strong Breeze Wind Farm contract, Rowe said DDOWT’s fight is far from over.

“We haven’t given up hope at all,” she said.

“We’re going to be committed to continuing to oppose it. It’s not over until they’re up and spinning.”

– with files from John Miner, London Free Press

— – —

Strong Breeze Wind Farm

Owned and operated by Chicago-based energy giant Invenergy
57.5 megawatt capacity
Received IESO approval in March 2016
1 of 16 projects approved under phase one of the LRP
84 per cent of Dutton Dunwich referendum respondents opposed the project

— – —

What They Said…

“It is frustrating. To me, they have an opportunity to look at the ones that they just approved. I would think it would be in their best interest to look at the controversial project… The community’s opposition hasn’t changed. They need to rethink what they approved back in March.”

– Dutton Dunwich Mayor Cameron McWilliam

“It’s very obvious to us they need to take a step back from the whole green energy plan… With the surplus of power Ontario already has, there is no logical reason to continue the wind turbine projects that were approved.”

– Bonnie Rowe, spokesperson for the Dutton Dunwich Opponents of Wind Turbines

“It is my hope that the government will continue to follow our Party’s advice and cancel the Dutton Dunwich wind project that has divided and torn the community apart… The community has been emphatically against any wind project in the municipality. This contract will produce energy we do not need.”

– Elgin-Middlesex-London MPP Jeff Yurek

Source:  Ontario energy: Residents want Dutton Dunwich wind farm project cancelled | Cancel Dutton Dunwich wind project: Tory MPP | By Jennifer Bieman, St. Thomas Times-Journal | Wednesday, September 28, 2016 | www.lfpress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.