[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Dixfield to hold hearing on wind ordinance 

Credit:  Liz Meisner, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | September 28, 2016 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

DIXFIELD – A public hearing is scheduled for 6 p.m. Thursday in the Community Room at Dirigo High School on repealing the 2012 wind power ordinance and allowing the state to regulate wind power in town.

Voters will decide the issue at the polls Nov. 8.

The Wind Energy Facility Ordinance was written after Patriot Renewables of Quincy, Massachusetts, approached town officials in October 2010 about constructing wind turbines on the Colonel Holman Mountain ridge. It passed in 2012, but its zoning restrictions were unenforceable.

In November 2014, an amended version was rejected. In June 2015, the Planning Board’s original draft was rejected by voters.

In June, townspeople voted against approving the most recent version of the ordinance, which included the state standard for sound limits of 42 decibels at night and 55 decibels during the day.

“The ordinance that is currently on the books gives the town local control by having a code enforcement officer make sure that (Patriot Renewables) is in compliance,” Town Manager Carlo Puiia said. “When that happens, it places a great responsibility on the community to enforce it. If the DEP governs it, it’s the agency’s responsibility to enforce compliance.”

Residents recently presented a petition to the Board of Selectmen requesting that the sound levels be limited to 39 decibels from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 52 decibels from 7 a.m to 7 p.m. After seeking legal advice, however, the board was forced to disregard the petition, mainly because of missing language and invalid signatures.

Source:  Liz Meisner, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | September 28, 2016 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky