[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine critics weigh in on proposed rules for future wind power development 

Credit:  By Nick McCrea, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Sept. 21, 2016 | bangordailynews.com ~~

BANGOR, Maine – As the state considers a new set of regulations for future wind power projects, Mainers worried about how turbines might affect their scenery and property values have more opportunity to air concerns and offer potential solutions.

Janet Chasse of Greenville is concerned that potential turbines in the Moosehead Lake region would hurt the views that drive locals and tourists there. She and groups of other locals have been fighting possible industrial wind power projects ever since developers placed test towers in the area.

“People are mortified and do not want that at Moosehead,” she said Wednesday during a workshop conducted in Bangor by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, which is working on a new set of rules to guide where future wind turbine developments will be permitted.

It’s been an “unusually windy” summer in the Moosehead region, Chasse added, and that has lead to concern that conditions could strengthen the case for a wind farm.

“Every time the wind blows, it depresses me,” she said.

In 2008, Maine’s Legislature passed the Wind Energy Act, which established state policy around wind farm developments. Some areas of the policy were left more open than others, and the state gave the Maine Department of Environmental Protection authority to set more specific rules in the future.

“The new rules will provide us more guidance when we review an application” for a proposed wind development, said Mark Bergeron, director of the Department of Environmental Protection’s Bureau of Land Resources.

About 30 people, many of them involved in various wind industry opposition and watchdog groups, attended Wednesday’s session on the Department of Environmental Protection’s “pre-rulemaking draft” of the regulations.

Their suggestions ranged from minor word changes to adding more details about what potential developers are required to prove.

The proposed standards regulate scenic character, or how a wind development would impact the views from or character of a “scenic resource of state or national significance” such as a mountain, lake or river; shadow flicker, or changes in light intensity caused by a rotating turbine; public safety; the requirements to prove tangible economic and environmental benefits of the development; and decommissioning, or the demolition of turbines in the event the company that operates them goes bankrupt or otherwise abandons them. A full copy of the draft is available on the state’s website.

The new rules will not cover major issues, such as changing setbacks or banning turbines in certain areas. A change in state law would be required for that to happen.

When a group proposes a new wind project, the onus will be on the developer to prove these standards are met, Bergeron said.

Kay Campbell of Jefferson suggested the state use computer simulations to determine the visual impacts of proposed turbine projects and give people a better idea of what to expect.

Chris King of Greenville asked that the Department of Environmental Protection require that wind industry applicants who collect meteorological data in advance of a development project reveal that information regardless of what it says. He’s concerned applicants wouldn’t include unfavorable data in their applications unless required to do so.

Bergeron said the Department of Environmental Protection would continue to work on the regulations, making changes based on public feedback before finishing an official draft of the rules later this fall. Another public comment session will be held when the official draft is completed.

Members of the public may still submit comments to the Department of Environmental Protection by emailing mark.t.margerum@maine.gov.

Source:  By Nick McCrea, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Sept. 21, 2016 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky