[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Phil Scott vows to protect ridgelines against Big Wind if elected governor  

Credit:  By Michael Bielawski | September 9, 2016 | watchdog.org ~~

SWANTON, Vt. – Facing the prospect of having seven 499-foot industrial turbines built on their prized Rocky Ridge hillside, local residents stood with Republican gubernatorial candidate Phil Scott to declare opposition to the project.

On Thursday, as wind energy developers Travis and Ashley Belisle filed an application for a certificate of public good with the Public Service Board, a crowd of residents, activists, state lawmakers and candidates for office stood with Scott as he doubled-down on his pledge to stop new wind energy projects in Vermont.

“I’m in favor of a complete ban on ridgeline development,” Scott said to much applause. “It’s very divisive, and we just don’t need that in Vermont.

“We need to come together, because I feel as though we need to be focusing on the economy, we need to focusing on jobs, we need to be focusing on other things besides this.”

If approved, the $40 million project would be built within a one-mile radius of 134 homes. The developers expect the project to deliver up to 20 megawatts of energy on windy days and generate about $150,000 in annual tax revenue for the town. Residents voted 731-160 to reject the project in a non-binding election last November.

Scott said if there were no alternatives to industrial wind then he could see a need for it, but he added that solar and other renewable technologies are advancing and wind is not. Lieutenant gubernatorial candidate Randy Brock, also on hand, said wind power is not the energy of the future.

“That’s one of the risks of doing a headlong rush into last century’s technology that’s only going to last into the middle of this century,” Brock said.

Some residents expressed worries that no amount of grassroots effort, or even legislative effort, will break the grip that wind energy lobbyists seem to have over Montpelier. Brock said he hears the same concern everywhere as he campaigns across Vermont.

“I’ve been to quite a number of the sites all over the state … and there’s a recurring theme throughout all of this: people feel that they have no power. People feel that they have a government that doesn’t listen to them.”

Scott cautioned that most Vermont residents do not live near big turbines and therefore tend to approve of wind energy development.

“If (wind developers) frame the question right, and they have the resources to do it, and they ask everyone across Vermont, ‘How do you feel about renewable energy and wind and so forth?’ The polls say we’re in favor of it.”

He added that if he wins the election he would use an executive order to stop new projects. Such a moratorium would likely last for as long as Scott remains in office. His opponent, Democrat Sue Minter, has been a strong advocate for wind energy development out on the campaign trail.

Brian Dubie, a local resident and Vermont’s former lieutenant governor, noted that Green Mountain Power opposes the project. Vermont’s top utility has no room in its portfolio to take on new wind power and wants to keep rates low for ratepayers, Dubie said.

“It has a negative impact when Vermonters are going to end up paying the bills for these things for decades,” he said.

Brock called the wind industry’s higher energy costs a “social justice issue.” He explained that low income Vermonters pay over 20 percent of their income on energy costs and would be hurt by expensive wind power. “For all intents and purposes, it’s Robin Hood in reverse,” he said.

Other concerns discussed at the gathering included the project’s impact on property values, wildlife, water runoff, turbine noise and more. Numerous residents noted that the rocky landscape would carry sound to more homes. Others said the use of renewable energy credits would cancel out any green benefits to the state.

Scott’s parting message was to not give up, to not be discouraged, and to know that he would do everything in his power as governor to put a halt on new projects.

Source:  By Michael Bielawski | September 9, 2016 | watchdog.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.