[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Great Lakes offshore wind farm has funding, but faces hurdles before construction  

Credit:  By Josh Bender | Great Lakes Echo | greatlakesecho.org ~~

Armed with a $40 million federal grant, the Lake Erie Energy Development Corp. (LEEDCo) plans to start building the first wind farm on the Great Lakes in the summer of 2018.

But government officials, legal experts and opponents of the Lake Erie project say many hurdles remain before construction can begin.

The company has yet to receive the go ahead from a litany of necessary state and federal regulatory bodies, said Suzanne Albright, a member of wind energy opposition group Great Lakes Wind Truth.

“It’s hard to say if they could start building in two years because we don’t even have the complete application,” said Ohio Power Siting Board outreach manager Matt Butler.

The siting board must approve the location of any new power generating facility in Ohio, said Nick Schroeck, director of the Wayne State University Law School’s Transnational Environmental Law Clinic.

Even after the corporation completes an application, it would take eight to fourteen months for the siting board to approve, Butler said. Even then an appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio by opposition groups could take years.

Such legal action by anti-wind energy activists is not a certainty, Albright said. “But be sure the opposition is not going to walk away.”

The siting board denied the corporation’s application for the project near Cleveland in April 2014. LEEDCo has not filed a new application since, according to siting board records. The board’s denial letter lists 14 concerns, mostly focused on the site of the turbines, the noise they generate and their potential to harm wildlife.

The corporation is addressing these concerns by proposing that the closest turbine be 18 miles from the Cleveland shoreline instead of the original seven, said Dave Karpinski, the corporation’s vice president of operations.

The siting board has requested a summary of the impact of the proposed wind turbines on birds and other wildlife.The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has yet to receive an initial application from the corporation, said Mark Scalabrino, chief of that agency’s Ohio application evaluation section. The Army Corp and LEEDCo had a pre-application meeting on July 19.

At the federal level, the main actors regulating the project are the U.S. Department of Energy and the Army Corps of Engineers, Schroeck said. At the state level they are the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Natural Resources.

These groups rely on input from numerous other government agencies, such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, he said.

Since federal and state regulators know this project likely is not the last offshore wind project application they will see, they may be more deliberative when handling LEEDCo’s project, he said. “They don’t want to have to reinvent the wheel every time they go through this permitting process.”

Despite these hurdles, financial support for the corporation in the public and private sectors continues to grow.

The corporation was awarded a $40 million Department of Energy grant in May and in 2014 entered into a partnership with Fred.Olsen, a Norwegian energy company. Fred. Olsen bought LEEDCo’s research assets and agreed to build the project, according to LEEDCo press releases.

“Typically when a company receives grants or tax credits from the Department of Energy they are farther along in the application process,” Schroeck said.

Typical nuclear or coal power plants produce up to 1,000 megawatts worth of energy, Karpinski said. LeedCo’s project will max out at 20 megawatts, about enough to power 6,000 homes.

Such a small project poses a correspondingly small threat to birds, according to a 2013 risk assessment report done by the New Jersey based Curry & Kerlinger wind energy consulting firm.

The six turbine project is intended to demonstrate offshore wind power in the Great Lakes with hope that similar projects will follow, said Ohio Sierra Club director Jen Miller. The club supports the project as a clean source of energy.

By 2019, a new offshore wind energy industry will be taking shape as utility scale projects in Lake Erie begin, according to LEEDCo’s website.

That has some people nervous.

“We are very concerned there will not be sufficient oversight over where these future wind turbines are placed,” said Sherri Lange, head of the North American Platform Against Wind Power, which represents numerous anti-wind energy groups across the U.S. and Canada.

Lake Erie is the only Great Lake crossed by songbirds, shorebirds and raptors and the birds pass through the western portion of the lake where LEEDCo’s project will stand, said Albright. The birds’ path includes the project’s proposed site.

Says LeedCo’s Karpinski: “Based on the data we have already collected and continue to collect there is minimal impact to wildlife.”

It is a hard threat to characterize. Counting carcasses to determine the number of birds killed by offshore turbines is difficult, if not impossible, according to the 2013 risk assessment report.

Carcasses simply float away or are consumed by animals, Albright said.

European offshore turbines have employed heat sensing, thermal imaging cameras to monitor the presence of birds with varying degrees of success, according to the report.

LEEDCo has and will continue to work with state and federal regulators to minimize the turbine’s threat to wildlife, Karpinski said.

People opposed to the turbines who are concerned about birds’ wellbeing need to consider the threat posed by climate change caused by burning fossil fuel, said Trish Demeter, managing director of energy programs for the Ohio Environmental Council, an environmental advocacy group in the state. The council supports the project.

“We need to do something about climate change and we need to do something now,” she said.

Source:  By Josh Bender | Great Lakes Echo | greatlakesecho.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.