[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Goshen wind farm eyed; 6 turbines proposed for Torrington Water Co. property  

Credit:  By John McKenna | Republican-American | August 27, 2016 | www.rep-am.com ~~

GOSHEN – A company that built the state’s first two commercial wind turbines in Colebrook wants to build six more similar turbines on Torrington Water Co. land here.

BNE Energy is proposing Wind Goshen, a wind-generation project on a ridgeline up to 1,500 feet above sea level. A map included in BNE Energy’s proposal to the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shows nine potential sites for six 19.9 megawatt turbines on wooded land off East Street North. Due to its elevation, orientation and topographical characteristics, the property would be an ideal location for energy generation, BNE Energy wrote in its proposal to DEEP.

Goshen First Selectman Robert P. Valentine said he is aware of the proposal and wants to know how the public feels about it.

“Wind turbines are something we’re all intrigued by,” Valentine said Friday. “At this point, I’m just looking for input from our residents.”

BNE Energy has signed a long-term land lease with the Torrington Water Co. that would allow the energy company to develop, own and operate the wind project. The project needs approval from DEEP and the state Siting Council, which ultimately decides the fate of any power generation project in Connecticut. Local officials can offer an opinion, but they have no authority on the outcome.

If BNE Energy secures the necessary approvals, it would erect the turbines in 2017 and have them running by the end of 2018, according to the company’s proposal.

Though the town’s land-use commissions won’t have a say on the proposal, Valentine said he’s hopeful an informational meeting will be held to give residents a chance to learn about the proposal and comment on it.

The first selectman noted that town-owned nature trails run through Torrington Water Co. land, near where the proposed turbines would be located.

“Those trails are certainly important and we’d like to be able to continue to use them,” Valentine said.

According to BNE Energy, the turbines would produce economic, environmental and societal benefits; would create jobs and would provide a source of low-cost renewable wind energy.

The turbines would be BNE’s first expansion since its initial hard-fought battle to erect wind turbines in Connecticut. The company first targeted a site in Prospect, where a swell of protest grew into heated public comment. Protesters even showed up outside the Siting Council as that project’s fate was debated. Prospect residents worried about the height of the turbines and setbacks from neighboring properties, as well as the flicker of natural light caused by the rotating blades; ice flying off the blades; bird kills by the rotating blades, and noise.

The Siting Council rejected the Prospect project, but it approved the company’s second proposal for Colebrook. That approval led to a legal challenge in 2012 from FairwindCT and from Colebrook residents who said the Siting Council had no authority to decide about wind turbines because state law defined its authority as over power-generating facilities that use either combustible fuel or a nuclear reaction.

The state Supreme Court ruled that the Siting Council did have proper authority, and state laws later were revised.

The original Colebrook proposal was for six turbines on two properties. So far, two have been built.

Power generated by the turbines is fed into the New England region’s power grid.

At least for some neighbors, they remain unwelcome, with residents complaining of headaches, high blood pressure, dizziness and insomnia they attribute to the low-frequency sound emitted by the blades. They based their concerns on the research of a scientist in the Netherlands, E.L. Petersen, who studied the effects of wind farms there.

Source:  By John McKenna | Republican-American | August 27, 2016 | www.rep-am.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch