[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

New rule would give wind farms 30-year permits for eagle deaths  

Credit:  GREG FLADAGER, For The Gazette | Billings Gazette | billingsgazette.com ~~

State regulators are monitoring a proposed regulation that would give the wind energy industry permits for incidental eagle deaths for up to 30 years.

While the new rule would allow permits that last three decades, they would also require a review every five years, bringing them more in line with existing eagle take permit regulations for all industries.

Eagle deaths have become an obstacle for wind developers in recent years, with one North Carolina company receiving a $1 million fine for killing birds at a wind farm near Glenrock. The length of take permits have also been a point of contention between industry and environmentalists.

The issue centers around a 2013 Fish and Wildlife decision giving wind farms and related transmission facilities the ability to acquire 30-year eagle take permits, even as other industries continue to be limited to five years.

A federal judge in California struck down the 30-year wind farm rule in 2014 after conservation groups challenged it on environmental grounds.

In February, the federal government said it was dropping its appeal of the court’s decision. Tyler Abbott, a deputy field supervisor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wyoming Ecological Services, told state lawmakers recently that a new rule, which contains the five-year review, was emerging as a result of those actions.

“That is what is being evaluated right now nationally, that is what that EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) is all about, and that our national office is working on,” Abbott said.

Meanwhile, industry groups, such as the Petroleum Association of Wyoming, also want to be included in the 30-year time frame provision.

Abbott told lawmakers Fish and Wildlife currently has a general policy of not seeking prosecution of any company that works cooperatively with regulators to create a bird protection plan on a project.

Furthermore, Abbott said the federal courts are divided on whether a company can even be charged for unintentional eagle kills under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The 10th Circuit Court, which serves Wyoming, has taken the position the government can’t prosecute, while federal courts in other parts of the country have ruled it can.

Abbott also explained the Fish and Wildlife Service does not have the authority to mandate companies get an incidental take permit. While some developers choose to create mitigation plans, there were others who do not want to go through the process, and simply risk a violation, he said.

Concerning enforcement, Abbott noted the Fish and Wildlife Service has only three enforcement officers in the state, and any recording of eagle deaths essentially falls on the company.

“Whether it’s wind energy development, or oil and gas, or for any other project, whether it’s solar or whatever, it really is up to the companies to implement that,” Abbott said.

The public comment period on the new Fish and Wildlife Service rules closed in July, and the agency is expected to release its new regulations later this year.

Source:  GREG FLADAGER, For The Gazette | Billings Gazette | billingsgazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch