[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ill wind over turbine appeals  

Credit:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | 15 July 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

A growing trend of gathering together rejected windfarm applications for the same areas and making “cumulative effect” decisions on their appeals has been condemned by campaigners.

Developers say the practice is now commonplace.

Windfarm protesters, however, are furious, claiming an imminent hearing in which two contentious Highland schemes are considered simultaneously will only confuse the issues, be unfair and illogical.

The Cnoc an Eas scheme near Drumnadrochit proposed by French firm EDF and Force 9 Energy could be considered alongside the spurned DBSE proposal for Druim Ba, at Kiltarlity.

The industry argues that conjoined appeals are practical to save time and money when there are common issues under the microscope, such as cumulative impact of giant turbines.

EDF has applied for the two Highland appeals to be heard together.

Highland anti windfarm campaigner Lyndsey Ward said: “This would appear to be a sly attempt to increase the odds of approval.

“Examining windfarms together will invariably mean the one considered the lesser of the two evils will go through.

“If Force 9 Energy believe their proposal will have a better chance against Druim Ba they are grossly mistaken.

“Both are robustly rejected by residents and Highland Council.”

She added: “Ruthless developers would have been sent packing long ago if the Scottish Government gave communities the same right to veto that is enjoyed by people south of the border.”

In a statement of appeal, Force 9 Energy presses for conjoined hearings on the grounds of landscape and visual impact issues.

“A decision on this appeal or the Druim Ba appeal taken in isolation would be inappropriate and contrary to the delivery and operation of a planning system ensuring that appropriate development is directed to the right places,” it states.

Speaking yesterday, Andrew Smith, head of planning and development at Force 9 Energy, said: “It’s common practice for multiple schemes to be heard in one appeal, not just windfarms but other projects.

“It’s useful for those taking the decision to consider issues that are common to both schemes.”

A recent joint appeal hearing concerning two separate Borders windfarms resulted in one of them being approved.

Source:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | 15 July 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.