[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Divisional court rejects wind energy challenge  

Credit:  Wind project appeal lost | By Paul Morden, Sarnia Observer | Monday, July 4, 2016 | www.theobserver.ca ~~

A London court has ruled against opponents of the Cedar Point wind project who appealed a provincial tribune decision on the 46-turbine wind project in Lambton County.

The Divisional Court’s decision, released last week following a hearing earlier this year, was a disappointment, said Santo Giorno, a spokesperson for We’re Against Industrial Turbines, Plympton-Wyoming (WAIT-PW), a group that supported the appeals by Aberarder residents Kimberley and Richard Bryce before Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal (ERT), and the Division Court.

“The court just didn’t agree with our point of view and decided to go with the view put forward by the developers and the government,” Girono said.

The Cedar Point wind project, owned by Suncor and NextEra, began operating last fall in Plympton-Wyoming, Lambton Shores and Warwick Township.

The appeal by the Bryce family was heard together with an appeal of a wind project near Owen Sound, and argued that tribunal decisions didn’t meet requirements set out in an earlier court ruling.

“I just feel really bad for everybody that put so much effort into it,” said Kimberley Bryce.

The family’s lawyer, Asha James, said they are considering their legal options.

Suncor spokesperson Nicole Fisher said the company and its partner NextEra are pleased with the court decision.

“We respect the rights of the appellants to raise their concerns through the ERT appeal process,” she said in an e-mail.

“Throughout the development, approval and construction process for the Cedar Point project, the partners have engaged with the community and remain committed to continuing the dialogue with the community throughout the life of the project.”

The Cedar Point project faced strong opposition from the community group, as well as the municipal council in Plympton-Wyoming.

WAIT-PW held fundraisers and collected donations to support the appeals.

“I think as far as Cedar Point is concerned, this is probably the end of the legal wrangling, from our perspective,” Giorno said.

WAIT-PW issued a joint press release with a citizen’s group that supported the Owen Sound appeal, following the release of the London court’s decision.

“The Green Energy Acts puts the burden of proof on citizens to prove that wind turbines are harmful,” Gary Fohr, with the Owen Sound area group, said in the release.

“We were asking the court to consider that wind turbines have never been proven safe.”

While the appeal wasn’t successful, “it had to be done,” Giorno said.

“It’s either a case of rolling over and pretending there’s no problem, or fighting against the system.”

Giorno said there have been several court challenges against wind projects in Ontario, and he expects more to come.

“I think at some point in time, there will be a reckoning.”

But, Giorno added WAIT-PW plans to shift its efforts to ensuring wind developers comply with the law, and to act as advocates for residents who “may have problems with issues arising from the project.”

Source:  Wind project appeal lost | By Paul Morden, Sarnia Observer | Monday, July 4, 2016 | www.theobserver.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.