[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Energy forum draws sparse crowd amid state local debates on power production  

Credit:  About 20 attend public event amid state, local debates on power production | By Mike Lawrence | Jun. 29, 2016 | www.southcoasttoday.com ~~

NEW BEDFORD – As panelists spoke Wednesday night about the proposed expansion of LNG storage and pipelines in Acushnet and Freetown, North End resident Christine Goben heard concerns that struck very close to home.

Goben said she sold her previous home, in Fairhaven, about three years ago, after one of the wind turbines in the town went up about 1,500 feet from her door. Hearing Roger Cabral of anti-LNG group South Coast Neighbors United talk about potential issues for residential neighborhoods near the proposed LNG expansion site, she said, was an “eye-opener” for her.

“That’s what happened to us – I’ve seen it,” she said. “I chose to give my home up because I didn’t want to fight anymore. We fought for about five years.”

Goben said her son lives near the expansion site, off Peckham Road in Acushnet, meaning energy debates could again become prominent for her family.

LNG and offshore wind debates weren’t prominent in the minds of many SouthCoasters on Wednesday night, though, as only about 20 people attended the free public forum at Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational-Technical High School on Ashley Boulevard.

The forum was a collaborative effort between the Marion Institute; Acadia Center, a nonprofit, multi-state organization that advocates for the development of clean energy; and other partners.

“This is a very sparse gathering,” said panelist Janet Milkman, executive director of the Marion Institute, who looked out from the stage at rows of empty seats.

“We’re having trouble getting traction, clearly,” she said.

In addition to Cabral and Milkman, other panelists were Claire Miller, lead community organizer for the Toxics Action Center, and Peter Shattuck, clean energy director for Acadia Center’s Massachusetts office.

The event had a decidedly anti-LNG, pro-renewable feel, as panelists urged attendees to take advantage of state energy efficiency incentives and contact their legislators about provisions in the omnibus energy bill, which the state Senate is scheduled to debate Thursday on Beacon Hill.

The Senate version of the bill, released last Friday, would require electricity distributors to enter long-term contracts for offshore wind energy totaling at least 2,000 MW, with build-out by 2030, and 400 MW as a minimum initial project.

Backers hope turbines will be installed over the next decade or more in leased federal waters south of Martha’s Vineyard. A potential staging site is the $113-million, state-funded Marine Commerce Terminal on New Bedford’s waterfront, just inside the hurricane barrier.

Shattuck noted the disparity between a massive natural gas expansion north of New Bedford, and the potential for large-scale offshore wind development in waters to the south.

“What we could see in the next six months is a decision about whether you’re going to have natural gas pipelines or offshore wind turbines on your energy bill,” he said.

LNG forums in recent weeks have drawn larger crowds in Acushnet. Attendees at Wednesday’s forum said “meeting fatigue,” a beautiful summer evening or other factors could have thinned that particular crowd.

Jennifer Downing of Leadership Southcoast, one of the forum partners, said additional energy-related events will be scheduled in coming months.

Source:  About 20 attend public event amid state, local debates on power production | By Mike Lawrence | Jun. 29, 2016 | www.southcoasttoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.