[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Douglas County Commission approves regulations for wind energy towers 

Credit:  By Elvyn Jones | Lawrence Journal-World | June 22, 2016 | www2.ljworld.com ~~

Douglas County now has regulations in place for wind energy towers, but no active applications for permits to install them.

That is the exact opposite of the situation the county faced in November 2013, when NextEra Energy sought permits to install two wind measurement towers in southern Douglas County. That application and public concerns prompted a two-and-a-half year in-house county effort to provide for the regulation of wind energy towers.

After a public hearing Wednesday, the County Commission approved a text amendment that would allow large commercial wind energy towers to be considered under the county’s conditional use permit process. Under the measure, wind towers producing 50 kilowatts or less for personal or small commercial onsite use would be considered under the county’s building permit procedures.

The text amendment was first brought before commissioners in February. Commissioners tabled consideration so that language for small uses could be fleshed out. Commission Chairman Jim Flory also asked planning staff to explore the county’s authority to expand protest petition rights beyond that required by state statute, which gives those owners of property within 1,500 feet of a parcel on which a tower was proposed the right to participate in a protest petition. Flory also suggested that protest boundary extend to a mile, which is the distance at which the text amendment requires neighbors be notified of an application.

But during Wednesday’s discussion, Flory agreed that the 1,500-foot protest boundary included in the updated text amendment was the right way to go. A larger area would dilute a protest petition’s effectiveness by making it more difficult to get the required signatures of 20 percent of property owners, he said.

The absence of active applications appears to have taken the wind out of public concern on the issue. Only a handful of county residents attended Wednesday’s public hearing. The comments of the two speakers at the hearing concerned the need for applicants to file for Federal Aviation Administration approval to construct a tower and for proper aviation lighting on towers 100 feet or more in height. Language regarding both issues was added to the text amendment.

With the commission’s approval of the measure, Flory, who had characterized wind towers as “monstrosities” when the amendment was first introduced in February, expressed satisfaction with the protection the measure gave county residents.

“I’ve been told (wind towers) are majestic, but my feeling is that how majestic they are is relative to how close they are to your front porch,” he said. “I stand as a reluctant supporter, depending on where they are.”

In other business, commissioners approved:

• An employee longevity program that will give those with five years or more of county employment an annual $50-per-year bonus. The program is to start in 2017, but commissioners expressed hope money could be found to reward employees this year. It was stated future commissions might have to adjust the $50 bonus amount because of budgetary issues.

• A measure that forbids the placement of political signs within 20 feet of the edge of a roadway or 300 feet of an intersection. The resolution allows signs 45 days before an election. They must be removed two days after an election.

Source:  By Elvyn Jones | Lawrence Journal-World | June 22, 2016 | www2.ljworld.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky