LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No application filed yet for Letcher wind farm 

Credit:  By Evan Hendershot on Jun 2, 2016 | The Daily Republic | www.mitchellrepublic.com ~~

LETCHER – Opposition to the construction of turbines in rural Letcher hasn’t knocked the wind out of the project’s sails.

Corey Juhl, vice president of project development for Juhl Energy, said his Minnesota-based company is still considering a plan to bring 9 to 11 wind turbines to the rural Sanborn County town. With the project still in a pre-development phase, the company has yet to file a permit application with the county. But it hasn’t slowed the flow of opposition against the potential project.

Despite the swell of dissatisfaction with the proposal to build turbines in rural Letcher mentioning the usual concerns against wind projects, including noise pollution, potentially diminished property values, lights attached to the towers and the overall sight of the turbines that would stand more than 400-feet tall, Juhl has heard some words of support as well.

“I would say we’ve heard more support than negative at this time,” Juhl said in a phone interview with The Daily Republic.

And Juhl’s not alone in hearing from supporters.

Sanborn County Commissioner Ray Ohlrogge, who has yet to decide whether he would support the project, said he’s also hearing from both opposition and proponents.

“I think the most attractive thing would be the amount of money that the farmer would get paid every year for a wind tower on their property,” Ohlrogge said Wednesday.

But Ohlrogge, who’s also on the county’s planning and zoning board, said he won’t make his decision until all the facts are on the table.

“I try to take the middle of the road until I can learn everything that I can,” Ohlrogge said.

Juhl said a project in Letcher would likely be similar to a proposal denied earlier this year by Davison County in a 4-1 vote.

The Davison County proposal would have cost $40 million and led to the construction of 446-foot turbines about 5 to 10 miles west of Mitchell. That project was estimated to generate approximately $66,000 in annual production taxes to be applied to two school districts, Davison County and Beulah Township, but the commission sided with many of the project’s neighbors who shared the same concerns as those in Letcher.

Ohlrogge said everyone in the area has reacted to the prospective proposal in Letcher differently, but he isn’t put off by the Davison County Commission’s denial of a similar project a few miles south of Letcher. When considering the project, if Juhl Energy files for a permit, Ohlrogge said there will be a lot of factors on the table.

“The wind energy is going to have to replace some of the coal energy and atomic energy somewhere along the line,” he said. “That’s got to be on your mind, because (wind) is a renewable energy.”

No timetable for the permit application was available, but Juhl said he’s committed to responsible business practices that remain within the industry norms for wind farms.

“We’re also just trying to do the right thing, we’re not trying to take advantage of any opportunistic setback laws,” Juhl said. “We’re doing all we can to hear the concerns, but at the same time, if it’s about building things that people could see from five miles away, there would not be much built in this country.

“We can’t help that someone doesn’t like it from miles and miles away, that’s something we cannot help and cannot fix.”

Source:  By Evan Hendershot on Jun 2, 2016 | The Daily Republic | www.mitchellrepublic.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon