[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Apex consultant sees no impact to Niagara Falls airbase 

Credit:  By JIM KRENCIK | The Daily News | June 2, 2016 | www.thedailynewsonline.com ~~

LYNDONVILLE – An energy industry consultant working with Apex Clean Energy swept through the area last week to shoot down fears off mission impacts to the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, if dozens of commercial-sized wind turbines are installed in Yates and Somerset.

Dave Belote, a former vice president for the Charlottesville, Va.-based wind energy developer, told air base staff and concerned citizens in Orleans and Niagara counties that the general location of a planned 200-megawatt wind energy sytem and the renewable energy project-related processes he designed for the Department of Defense should pose no hurdles for NFARS or its remotely=piloted drone missions.

“(Apex has received) the strongest letter they could get at this point,” Belote said Friday, citing the Pentagon’s response to a proposal from Apex for the Lighthouse Wind project. “They are not worried about encroachment, and we wanted to share it with everyone.”

Apex Clean Energy, which last month announced plans to investigate another project in Barre, has submitted a preliminary application for state siting board approval for the Lighthouse Wind project. While no specific turbine sites are listed in the initial scoping statement, Belote said they submitted a “maxed out” version of the plan for DoD.

“Apex hasn’t determined all the turbines they might buy, but they to pentagon because of local concern to do the informal process,” Belote said.

A survey conducted by Save Ontario Shores in Yates last autumn found 347 to 61 respondents agreed with the statement “should an impact study be done concerning potential radar interference” on the base and Mercy Flight communications.

S.O.S. President Pam Atwater met with Belote but left saying the meeting continued a stream of vague statements and withheld data.

“We did not hear anything that has changed our position,” Atwater said in a statement Thursday. “Apex will use every option available to them, including using high-paid D.C. lobbyists, to try and force this project upon communities that have legitimate concerns about the impact of the project on local employment and have clearly expressed they do not want the wind turbines installed.”

While the Niagara Falls base has faced realignment or closure in past Congressional reviews of the nation’s military installations, Belote said having upwards of 60 turbines located 20 miles away would not be unprecedented. The former commander of the 2.9-million acre Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada said he worked to site solar panels and wind towers at his base.

“Travis Air Force Base, the largest aerial facility in the country, has 890 turbines between 4.5 and 12 miles of the airfield,” Belote said. “They learned how to conduct technical fixes and have the private sector contribute to protecting the mission.”

The Department of Defense can review renewable energy proposals and force developers to relocate structures and other aspects of projects to accommodate nearby operations. Apex’s request came at an earlier stage and focused on impact to future base operations.

As for the drone missions flown out of Niagara Falls, Belote said they saw “no point where there would be interference from turbines.”

Source:  By JIM KRENCIK | The Daily News | June 2, 2016 | www.thedailynewsonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky