[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ Google-powered ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

PSC holds first work session on proposed Stark County wind farm  

[Commissioner Randy] Christmann added he also finds the industry frustrating with how they pick locations.

“It makes me feel like the payment is maybe too generous to participating landowners and not generous enough to non-participating landowners,” he said.

Christmann said he was concerned with the proximity of turbines to non-participating landowners when there was land that could be used closer to Highway 22.

“Speaking for me, I would rather put them closer to the highway and impact motorists instead of impacting non-participating landowners,” he said.

Credit:  By Kalsey Stults on May 6, 2016 | The Dickinson Press | www.thedickinsonpress.com ~~

BISMARCK – For the first time Friday, members of the state Public Service Commission provided insight into their opinions of the 87-turbine wind farm proposed for southern Stark County.

The PSC held its first work session on the proposed 150-megawatt Brady Wind Energy Center at its offices in Bismarck, and overall expressed support for the project despite a few apprehensions.

“I overall support the project,” commissioner Brian Kalk said. “There are some concerns that I have that we are going to have to work through.”

The PSC heard 15 hours of testimony and public comment regarding the project proposed by Florida-based NextEra Energy Resources on March 31 at Dickinson City Hall. Now, the commission has to sift through all of the exhibits, testimony and information received on that day.

Friday was the first time Kalk, commission Chair Julie Fedorchak and commissioner Randy Christmann were able to review late file exhibits from NextEra and the Concerned Citizens of Stark County, a local group opposed to the project.

“I thought today that we actually got a lot accomplished,” Kalk said.

He said he believes after Friday that everyone is overall in support of the project.

“I think that’s what I heard Julie say today too. I think that’s what I heard Randy say today too,” Kalk said. “Overall, we are all in support of it. But we all have little things that we need to carve out to get to where we are completely ready to cast the vote.”

Even though Kalk believes the PSC is in support, he and Christmann did speak to those watching via an Internet broadcast, saying commissioners are not fond of the way wind companies are deciding on locations to place turbines by “checkerboarding,” where non-participating landowners are embedded in the project with participating landowners.

“When you bring this kind of project with this kind of checkerboard, expect this kind of discussion,” he said to those watching via an Internet broadcast. “I support this project. I do support it. The issue I have right now is the non-participating landowners embedded in this project.”

Christmann added he also finds the industry frustrating with how they pick locations.

“It makes me feel like the payment is maybe too generous to participating landowners and not generous enough to non-participating landowners,” he said.

Christmann said he was concerned with the proximity of turbines to non-participating landowners when there was land that could be used closer to Highway 22.

“Speaking for me, I would rather put them closer to the highway and impact motorists instead of impacting non-participating landowners,” he said.

PSC attorney Zachary Pelham said he’d contact Stark County commissioners about the setback rules and present their answers to the PSC during its next work session at 1:30 p.m. MDT May 19 at its Bismarck offices. The public can watch the session via an Internet broadcast at psc.nd.gov.

Kalk, however, said not to expect a hasty decision on the project’s fate.

“There’s not going to a decision next week,” Kalk said.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Kalsey Stults on May 6, 2016 | The Dickinson Press | www.thedickinsonpress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User contributions

Share:


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share