[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

How to pay for wind monitoring  

Credit:  Rutland Herald | May 05,2016 | rutlandherald.com ~~

Having read both Annette Smith’s article “Industrial wind turbines require sound monitoring” and Mary Powell’s reply titled “No shame in success,” I was amused at how deftly Mary changed the subject.

Annette used Mary’s CEO salary as an example of how much is spent on upper management while that upper management opposes any requirement to monitor wind turbine sound, the cost of which pales in comparison. Annette pointed out that the more projects GMP builds, the more money Mary makes.

Nothing was said in Annette’s article about Mary making too much money as the CEO of GMP. Nor was there anything about poor Mary not making as much as her male counterparts. It was simply that monitoring costs very little when compared to a CEO salary, and Mary happens to be the “local” CEO.

Monitoring sound is needed to protect the health of families who live near industrial wind projects, but that monitoring could force companies to shut down the turbines when they are out of compliance.

Mary Powell didn’t want to discuss the negative effects of wind power so instead she talked about how difficult it is for a woman in a man’s world at the CEO level and for women in general.

There was nothing in Annette’s article that attempted to “shame” Mary Powell for being successful or for becoming a CEO. But Mary Powell should be ashamed that she saw her own situation as being more important than caring about the health of people living near commercial wind turbines.



Source:  Rutland Herald | May 05,2016 | rutlandherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.