LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

FAQs

Research Links

Selected Documents

Campaign Material

VIDEOS

Photos & Graphics

Store

ALLIES

Wind Watch is a user-supported educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors (as do news stories for that matter); National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way, nor should it be implied that the writers endorse National Wind Watch.

Big wind fails to change state law 

Credit:  Letter: Big wind fails to change state law | Argus Leader | April 24, 2016 | www.argusleader.com ~~

I would like to thank all the South Dakota state legislators who could see through the shenanigans of the industrial wind industry in Pierre this year. Those who could not were Reps. G. Mark Mickelson, R-Dist. 13; Thomas Holmes, R-Dist. 14; John Wiik, R-Dist. 4; James Schaefer, R-Dist. 26B; Dean Schrempp, D-Dist. 28A; Mark Willadsen, R-Dist. 11; Kristin Conzet, R-Dist. 32; Patrick Kirschman, D-Dist. 15; Al Novstrup, R-Dist. 3; and Scott Craig, R-Dist. 33; and Sens. William Shorma, R-Dist. 16; Blake Curd, R-Dist. 12; Scott Feigen, R-Dist. 25; Jenna Haggar, R-Dist. 10; Betty Olson, R-Dist. 28; Scott Parsley, D-Dist. 8; Jason Frerichs, D-Dist. 1; Jeff Monroe, R-Dist. 24; Arthur Rusch, R-Dist. 17; Brock Greenfield, R-Dist. 2; Bernie Hunhoff, D-Dist. 18; and Jim Peterson, D-Dist. 4.

A wind farm in South Dakota constructed at least seven turbines that were placed too close to residence/property lines. Instead of finding a resolution that the offended parties could agree to, the solution of the wind industry was to try to change state law. They wrote or hog housed two separate bills, HB1106 and SB76, in an attempt to change state law so the offending turbines would be outside the setback distance. This would help prevent legal action towards them where they might have to remove the turbines or compensate property owners at great cost, for a mistake that they themselves made.

Once again, this shows the lack of respect, selfishness and disregard for the health, safety and welfare the wind industry and their lobbyists have for the citizens of S.D.

Deanna Brouwer, Beresford

Source:  Letter: Big wind fails to change state law | Argus Leader | April 24, 2016 | www.argusleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI BS M TS TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Bluesky Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab