[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Pre-hearing begins in Clearview Township turbine appeal case  

Credit:  By Ian Adams | Wasaga Sun | www.simcoe.com ~~

The parties in the fight to stop a wind turbine project near the Collingwood Regional Airport have lined up a few more allies.

On Tuesday, the Environmental Review Tribunal held a pre-hearing on the appeal of six parties to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change’s decision to approve WPD Canada’s Fairview Wind project.

WPD plans to erect eight 500-foot turbines in an area around County Road 91, including two considered within the four-kilometre ‘outer circle’ of the airport.

The full hearing is scheduled to take place over three weeks, beginning May 16.

The Town of Collingwood, Clearview Township, and the County of Simcoe have filed appeals to the decision, along with Kevin and Gail Elwood, John Wiggins, and a group of residents known as Preserve Clearview.

On Tuesday, the hearing panel of Dirk VanderBent and Hugh Wilkins gave participant and presenter status to several other groups and residents – all of whom signalled their opposition to the proposal.

Joining the fight are the Canadian Owner and Pilots Association (COPA), the Ontario Landowners Association, Susan Richardson, the Collingwood Flying Club and George Daniels, and Mandy and Stephen Bridson.

The appellant parties are arguing for WPD’s approval to be revoked based on the potential harm to human health based on a variety of physical responses to wind turbines, as well as the potential harm the turbines posed to human health by their proximity to the airport.

COPA’s counsel Glen Grenier highlighted the potential negative impact to both the regional airport, as well as the aerodrome owned by the Elwoods, given the national importance of air travel, “and it’s importance here.”

Richardson and the Bridsons both focused on the potential impact to the natural environment by the turbines in their submissions to gain presenter status.

“We’re not experts in law and the environment, but we are passionate about environmental issues,” the Bridsons stated in their submission to the panel.

The parties will be part of a pre-hearing teleconference on May 10 for presentation of motions.

Source:  By Ian Adams | Wasaga Sun | www.simcoe.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.