[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

County Commission to consider wind-energy tower regulations  

Credit:  By Elvyn Jones | Lawrence Journal-World | April 5, 2016 | www2.ljworld.com ~~

The Douglas County Commission on Wednesday will consider regulations for wind generation towers and systems.

Consideration of the text amendment to county zoning regulations will include a public hearing at the meeting, which starts at 4 p.m. Wednesday in the Douglas County Courthouse, 1100 Massachusetts St. With the wind farm issue having a long and controversial history in the county, no formal action is expected on the text amendments that will be coming before commissioners for the first time, a fact signaled by the County Commission’s consideration at the same meeting of a measure to extend the moratorium on wind farms through July 31.

The county has had a moratorium on wind-generated energy systems since December 2013. The moratorium was in response to the county’s lack of regulatory language concerning wind towers that came to light when NextEra Energy of Florida applied for a conditional use permit to install two meteorological towers to measure wind speeds in southern Douglas County.

The County Commission followed that initial action with a study session on wind energy development in February 2014 and extended the moratorium on several occasions before directing county staff to work on the new regulations last year.

The measure commissioners will consider would establish a two-tier approach to regulating wind generation towers. Proposed text amendment language will regulate those for personal and small commercial use, which are defined as towers with a generating capacity of 50 kilowatts or less for consumption on site. Those applications would be addressed with building permits, with language developed to address setbacks, height, appearance and other effects on neighboring properties.

Large commercial applications, such as the NextEra Energy proposal, will continue to be considered through the county’s conditional use permit process. To make use of the conditional use permit process possible, the text amendment adds wind towers as a permitted CUP use. It also establishes the application process for developers, which requires a general concept plan, defined construction phasing, the amount of property to be disturbed or cleared and forbids transfer of the CUP without the County Commission’s approval.

The proposed CUP language addresses the visual, noise, soil erosion, water quality, cultural heritage and infrastructure impacts of proposed towers.

The CUP process would require the developer to notify all property owners within a 1-mile radius of the proposed site. It would also stipulate towers be set back from adjacent property lines the distance equal to 110 percent of the towers’ height plus the length of blades and that no residential structures can be closer than 1,500 feet to towers.

The CUP also has language regulating the decommissioning and removal of towers. Applicants would be required to maintain a surety bond with the county as payee to ensure towers would be removed.

NextEra Energy’s initial CUP application has expired. It is noted in background information provided to the County Commission that the company has indicated to Douglas County Administrator Craig Weinaug that it still plans to explore the potential of wind power in the southern part of the county.

The company briefly did install a meteorological tower northeast of Baldwin City without a permit, which was removed in June 2015 with its discovery by county codes officers.

Source:  By Elvyn Jones | Lawrence Journal-World | April 5, 2016 | www2.ljworld.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.