[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines take too much space 

Credit:  Your letters March 23, 2016 | St. Joseph News-Press | www.newspressnow.com ~~

In a March 16 letter, Jeremy Ferrell makes several statements that require a response. The one I will address first is: “wind turbines have an incredibly small footprint.”

I beg to differ.

My source of facts states: “It takes 36 square miles of wind turbines (50 stories tall) to produce the same amount of energy as one semitrailer-mounted gas plant that fits inside the average dairy barn.”

Sound preposterous?

From the Invenergy Wind site, we find this:

“Natural gas is the fuel of choice for Invenergy’s thermal power facilities, which use the most efficient technologies available to minimize environmental impact. The U.S. alone has more than a 100-year supply of reliable, affordable natural gas, the cleanest fossil fuel available for power generation. Every megawatt of power generated by an Invenergy natural gas-fueled plant produces nearly 45 percent less carbon dioxide than would a typical coal-fired power plant of similar scale.”

Again, a fact check states: “The $3 billion spent (so far) by the state of Michigan (for wind energy) has produced a CO2 savings of about 6 percent. If those funds had instead been invested in combined-cycle gas turbine plants, emissions savings would have been 50 percent – or, for every ton of emissions reduced by wind, an 8-ton reduction would have occurred with combined-cycle gas turbine plants.” (Plants that occupy far less area; one dairy barn vs. 36 square miles, for example.)

Saying that “wind turbines have an incredibly small footprint” really depends on what you compare them to. I actually wonder if there is any energy production system that takes as much space as wind does.

So, why do hundreds of monstrous and inefficient wind turbines continue to be built?

Oh, yeah – the subsidies.

Glenda Aughinbaugh

Stewartsville, Missouri

Source:  Your letters March 23, 2016 | St. Joseph News-Press | www.newspressnow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky