[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm submissions show divided opinions  

Credit:  By ELLE WATSON | Mudgee Guardian | March 18, 2016 | www.mudgeeguardian.com.au ~~

Submissions for and against the Crudine Ridge Wind Farm near Pyramul have been published online one month after a public meeting on the divisive proposal.

The Planning Assessment Commission received 68 written submissions from nearby residents and interest groups on the 77 wind turbine farm that was recommended for approval by the Department of Planning and Environment in December last year.

The independent body will consider the submissions ahead of its determination with a date yet to be set.

The majority of submissions were read to the commission at the Pyramul meeting on February 10.

Among the 23 speakers who addressed the PAC members were landowners like Brendan Cole who will host the 160-metre high turbines.

“This will be a windfall for me, providing ongoing financial incentive, an opportunity that comes only once in a lifetime,” Mr Cole said in his submission.

“It will give me the ability to improve the infrastructure on my farm and improve my management and lifestyle. It will enable me to employ more labour on my property to achieve the improvements I need.”

He said the project is the community’s “contribution to slowing climate change” that will accommodate farming unlike coal mining.

Penny Hundy will see 30 53 story high turbines from her kitchen window.

“As a non-involved landowner who completely objects to this project, ‘moderate’ visual impacts, that is the second highest possible level, should be considered as unacceptable,” her submission said.

“I believe further wind turbines need to be removed until ‘non-involved’ landowners are subjected to no more than ‘low’ visual impacts.”

Others have reported inaccurate mapping by the developer that has resulted in incorrect noise and visual impact estimations.

At least 24 turbines from the Sallys Flat cluster will be seen from Alicia Hawkins’ parents’ property – classified as ‘high visual impact’.

“My parents will be able to view from their home further turbines from the Pyramul cluster, which has not been discussed in any reports regarding this wind farm. Without an accurate presentation of predicted visual impact from the property, both the Department of Planning and Environment and my parents are unable to achieve a full understanding of the impact of the proposed turbines on this property, both visually and financially through loss of property value.”

Tim Rowland-Jones is building a house on his property but said he has never been contacted with the developer.

He said noise estimations had been done for a residence on his property that does not exist and is “not even remotely close to where the actual house is to be built”.

“We have been supplied with false and misleading information, led to believe in something that is not to be the case,” he said in his submission. “I believe this project must be at least suspended until all of the local residents who will be directly impacted by this have at least been consulted, are provided with correct and accurate information and more importantly are considered.”

Source:  By ELLE WATSON | Mudgee Guardian | March 18, 2016 | www.mudgeeguardian.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.