[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial Dent Fell turbine will not be built  

Credit:  By Andrew Clarke | The Whitehaven News | March 17, 2016 | www.whitehavennews.co.uk ~~

A highly controversial wind turbine will NOT be built at the foot of the picturesque Dent Fell – the government has ruled.

Copeland Council rejected plans last year for the 48m-high structure on farmland at Cobble Hall, Cleator Moor, having received strong objections from local residents and councillors.

The applicant, David Spedding, challenged the decision, but his appeal has now been thrown out by the government’s Planning Inspectorate.

The Inspectorate’s Philip Asquith agreed with Copeland’s assessment that the “dominating” three-blade turbine would case “considerable harm to the character and appearance” of the area.

Mr Asquith said: “The turbine would be seen in views across the Ehen Valley from the A595 to the north of Egremont, and from the minor road off the A595 dropping to Woodend.

“From Longlands Lake, it would be seen above the trees surrounding the lake and within the context of the rising land of Dent Fell.

“It is also likely to be a prominent landscape element for those on the nationally-recognised Coast to Coast Walk.”

He added that the local objections from those concerned about visual impact were “considerable”, and the positives in terms of renewable energy did not outweigh the harm the turbine would cause.

The application had attracted 163 letters of protest from residents, in addition to objections from Egremont Town Council, Cleator Moor Town Council and the National Trust.

Objector Elaine Rudd said: “This area is the gateway to the fells. Any gain would be outweighed by the visual and environmental devastation it would cause.”

Fellow objector Ian McIntyre added: “This could be really detrimental to the area and the local community.”

Source:  By Andrew Clarke | The Whitehaven News | March 17, 2016 | www.whitehavennews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.