[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Foes cite wind power firm’s failure to agree to state-mandated code of conduct for Somerset project  

Credit:  By Thomas J. Prohaska, News Niagara Reporter | The Buffalo News | March 6, 2016 | www.buffalonews.com ~~

SOMERSET – Opponents of Apex Clean Energy’s wind power project in Somerset and Yates have fastened on the company’s failure to agree to a state-mandated code of conduct as another reason to object to the plan.

Apex, of Charlottesville, Va., is proposing to erect as many as 70 wind turbines in the two towns on the Lake Ontario shore, under the name of Lighthouse Wind. Surveys of property owners in both towns have shown that about two-thirds oppose the project, but there have been enough exceptions for Apex to put more than 5,000 acres under lease.

That’s where the code of conduct comes in. Its stated purpose is to require the company to disclose whether any local public officials or their family members have signed leases of land for turbines.

Somerset Supervisor Daniel M. Engert said Friday that he is known since last year that three town officials have had to recuse themselves from any role in the wind power process because they have signed leases.

When the Town Board passed a law Feb. 24 that sought to confine the turbines to areas away from the lakeshore, Councilman Gary R. Alt abstained on all the votes. Alt said the reason was that his mother has signed a lease with Apex, which is offering to pay landowners $15,000 a year for every turbine on their property.

Engert said Christopher Czelusta, a member of the town Planning Board, and Stephen Lee, the town code-enforcement officer, also have signed leases with Apex.

Engert said another code-enforcement officer, Mark D. Remington, will be in charge of checking out the condition of the meteorological tower Apex has built to gather data on wind and weather conditions in Somerset. The company wants to build another one, but a Planning Board public hearing Thursday was left open until a wide range of questions posed during the session can be answered.

Apex said that it has been corresponding with the state Attorney General’s Office about the exact terms of the code of conduct, which was revised this year.

Development manager Taylor Quarles said, “Lighthouse Wind and the attorney general are currently discussing corrections and clarifications to the new code, and following these revisions, we anticipate executing the new code.”

The company’s website says the code was put in place when local governments, not the state, decided on wind projects. Now, Article 10 of the state Public Service Law gives a state siting board, not localities, control over whether and where a project is built, so the code should be revised, Apex said.

“I think these assertions are completely false,” Engert countered. “Reasonable local laws are not nullified under Article 10.” He also objected to the town having been left out of the talks over the code’s provisions.

Meanwhile, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo appointed Russell Martino, a former Yates supervisor, as a local member of the siting board. Cuomo acted at the request of State Sen. Robert G. Ortt, R-North Tonawanda, and Assemblyman Stephen M. Hawley, R-Batavia, after Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie, D-Bronx, failed to appoint a local member, as required.

Senate Majority Leader John J. Flanagan Jr., R-Huntington, previously appointed a Somerset resident, Randall B. Atwater, whose wife, Pamela R. Atwater, is president of Save Ontario Shores, a citizen group opposing the project. Five of the seven board members are officials of state agencies.

Source:  By Thomas J. Prohaska, News Niagara Reporter | The Buffalo News | March 6, 2016 | www.buffalonews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.