LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

City seeks to recover funds in Hirschelf lawsuit 

Credit:  By Daija Barrett | 03/02 2016 | www.conchovalleyhomepage.com ~~

The city of San Angelo and it’s Development Corporation is going head to head with a company who committed to provide hundreds of wind-energy related jobs, but now that company has failed to fulfill its promise, so now the city is looking to get back what’s owed to them.

The city of San Angelo Development Corporation and the city are seeking to recover more than 2.7 million dollars in damages, attorneys’ fees and minor costs all from a 2009 investment to bring a wind turbine tower fabrication plant to San Angelo.

COSADC and the city filed the lawsuit against Martifer-Hirschfeld Energy Systems early last year, when the company committed to investing $40 million into its wind energy plant, creating 225 full-time jobs for local and area residents.

In a city news release published Monday, the release stated, and I quote, “Before filing suit, the City and the COSADC worked patiently and tirelessly to resolve the matter.”

The release goes on to say that court documents show that Martifer-Hirschfeld failed to live up to its contractual obligations with the city…and never offered to repay more than a slim fraction of the millions it received.

The attorney representing the company declined an on camera comment but issued this quote, saying “Martifer-Hirschfeld tried to work with the city and did everything it could to save the plant.” He goes on to say “the company did its best for the city and will continue to do so.”

Judge Ben Woodward did not make a ruling on Tuesday’s summary hearing, which means the city may or may not be back in court. But at the end of the hearing the judge did say, “He’ll keep in touch.”

Click here for the city’s statement on Hirschfeld lawsuit.

Source:  By Daija Barrett | 03/02 2016 | www.conchovalleyhomepage.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky