[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial Rothienorman turbine scheme scrapped  

Credit:  By Joshua King | 2 March 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Controversial proposals to build two 260ft wind turbines near a series of historic monuments have been thrown out by councillors.

Members of the Formartine area committee rejected the plan to construct the turbines at Hassiewells near Rothienorman when they met yesterday.

The scheme was tabled by Muirden Energy on behalf of Hassiewells Renewables and was a fresh attempt to build wind turbines on the site following a previously unsuccessful application.

Aberdeenshire Council planners had urged councillors to block the new scheme, due to the impact on nearby ancient sites including a Roman camp.

The planning team also raised concerns about the noise generated by two turbines. In total, 30 letters of objection were received by the council with a further 20 in support of the turbines.

But, despite the planners recommendation and a lengthy debate between local members, the committee was evenly split on whether or not to grant planning permission.

Local councillor Anne Robertson said: “The noise mitigation has been considered by environmental services and they maintain their objection.

“I think, given the siting of the turbines, we would need – on balance – to support the officers’ recommendation.”

However, fellow Turriff and District member, Sandy Duncan said: “I don’t understand the noise issues when there are similar turbines in the area and we don’t hear complaints.

“I also don’t think the archaeological sites are impacted by the turbines.”

Eventually, chairman Rob Merson was forced to step in and use his deciding vote to block the project.

He added: “I share the concerns that have been raised. This isn’t an ideal site.”

Source:  By Joshua King | 2 March 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.