LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Controversial Rothienorman turbine scheme scrapped 

Credit:  By Joshua King | 2 March 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Controversial proposals to build two 260ft wind turbines near a series of historic monuments have been thrown out by councillors.

Members of the Formartine area committee rejected the plan to construct the turbines at Hassiewells near Rothienorman when they met yesterday.

The scheme was tabled by Muirden Energy on behalf of Hassiewells Renewables and was a fresh attempt to build wind turbines on the site following a previously unsuccessful application.

Aberdeenshire Council planners had urged councillors to block the new scheme, due to the impact on nearby ancient sites including a Roman camp.

The planning team also raised concerns about the noise generated by two turbines. In total, 30 letters of objection were received by the council with a further 20 in support of the turbines.

But, despite the planners recommendation and a lengthy debate between local members, the committee was evenly split on whether or not to grant planning permission.

Local councillor Anne Robertson said: “The noise mitigation has been considered by environmental services and they maintain their objection.

“I think, given the siting of the turbines, we would need – on balance – to support the officers’ recommendation.”

However, fellow Turriff and District member, Sandy Duncan said: “I don’t understand the noise issues when there are similar turbines in the area and we don’t hear complaints.

“I also don’t think the archaeological sites are impacted by the turbines.”

Eventually, chairman Rob Merson was forced to step in and use his deciding vote to block the project.

He added: “I share the concerns that have been raised. This isn’t an ideal site.”

Source:  By Joshua King | 2 March 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky