LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Drawing a line 

Credit:  Mount Desert Islander | February 26, 2016 | www.mdislander.com ~~

Three Southern New England states want to turn Maine into their wind plantation, and Central Maine Power and Emera Maine appear to be enthusiastic supporters of that plan. Last November, a consortium of agencies and electric utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island issued a Request for Proposals to deliver at least 5,000 gigawatt hours of clean energy to those states, with proposals due by Jan. 28, 2016. According to Friends of Maine’s Mountains, developers now have responded with over 51 project proposals, many of them in Maine, which will undergo reviews in the next several months.

Among those proposals is SunEdison’s Weaver Wind project, which would place 22 more giant wind turbines near Eastbrook in Hancock County. CMP and Emera Maine have joined forces to submit the Maine Renewable Energy Interconnect (MREI), which would transmit up to 1,200 megawatts of energy from wind projects in northern Maine to power at least 250,000 homes in the southern New England states. The proposed MREI would include 150 miles of new transmission line and new substations that would work hand in glove with the proliferation of wind turbines on Maine’s hills and mountains. Emera Maine President Alan Richardson touted the project in a recent press release. “MREI offers a number of differentiating elements that we believe will be very attractive to the states that are seeking new sources of clean energy,” he said. “MREI will be able to deliver that energy on time and at a competitive price because we are tapping our existing infrastructure.”

Promoters of the Clean Energy RFP, which embraces the various project proposals, are quick to claim that the addition of hundreds of wind turbines in our state will reduce emissions from burning fossil fuels and enhance price stability, energy security and supply diversity.

But as Chris O’Neil, policy director for Friends of Maine’s Mountains, observed, “Maine and New England already have among the cleanest and most expensive electricity in America. Now southern New England wants to make it even more expensive while turning Maine into their wind plantation. It is unacceptable, and we need to stop it.”

“Ratepayers and taxpayers will be forced to squander billions of dollars on unnecessary and unreliable energy infrastructure that still will require conventional generation to keep the grid running,” said O’Neil, “and that won’t put a dent in climate change. We need dispatchable base load power if we want to keep closing older plants.”

O’Neil projected that “the industrial assault” on Maine would result in more than 2,000 additional installed megawatts of the towering wind turbines, all to supply only about 500 of 16,000 to 26,000 megawatts of electricity that the New England grid requires on a daily basis.

We’ve observed before in these columns that the misguided focus on wind energy is not going to make Maine any “greener.” Even before the wind turbines began sprouting across the landscape, Maine was generating almost all of its electricity from clean sources, sources other than oil and coal. Rather than pave the way for still more visually disruptive wind turbines, the state would be better served by the removal of the statutory 100-megawatt cap on electricity generation other than by wind. That cap denies Maine the option of purchasing electricity from massive Canadian hydropower projects.

Wind turbines operate only when the wind blows. That is an inescapable reality that makes such energy generation intermittent and unreliable. Encouraging boondoggles such as the Clean Energy RFP certainly will satisfy residents beyond our own borders who don’t want to see wind turbines scattered across their own states.

Maine’s greatest resource is our fabulous scenery – mountains, lakes, rivers and ocean coastline. Already, the horizon north of Mount Desert Island, as seen from Cadillac Mountain in Acadia National Park, glows nightly with a line of flashing red beacons of existing windmills. Continuing to ravage our birthright to support a misguided feel-good energy policy is an insult to our own citizens, their children and their grandchildren.

Source:  Mount Desert Islander | February 26, 2016 | www.mdislander.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky