[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Renewable energy bill faces test in Senate  

Credit:  Written by Hillary Borrud/Capital Bureau | 23 February 2016 | portlandtribune.com ~~

SALEM – A bill to double Oregon’s renewable energy mandate is headed for a vote as soon as Wednesday in the state Senate, where it faces an uncertain fate.

The Senate Committee on Business and Transportation voted 3-2 Monday afternoon to pass an amended version of the bill out of committee. Committee chair Sen. Lee Beyer, D-Springfield, wrote the amendment in an attempt to address concerns that the bill, which was negotiated behind closed doors by the state’s two investor-owned utilities, environmental groups, the renewable energy industry and Citizens Utility Board of Oregon, will be costly to consumers and businesses.

Beyer said the amendment strengthened the role of the Public Utility Commission, in response to criticism the earlier version would have weakened commission oversight.

Utilities objected to a provision in the amendment that would lower the annual cost cap for the renewable energy mandate from 4 percent to 3 percent. The existing renewable energy mandate allows utilities to ask the Public Utility Commission to approve rate increases based on costs incurred to meet the law.

“I’m not sure why changing it advances the policy now,” said Scott Bolton, a vice president at PacifiCorp.

Ry Schwark, a spokesman for PacifiCorp, said he expected the bill might still undergo changes. “Since this now will likely need to go to conference, much will depend upon what comes out the other end of that process,” Schwark wrote in an email.

Beyer’s amendment also expanded the types of energy the utilities could use to meet the renewables mandate to include certain hydropower projects, biomass and power plants that burn municipal solid waste. That provision did not appear to be controversial.

Beyer was also trying to shore up support for the bill after news reports last week that Gov. Kate Brown’s administration silenced state energy regulators who critiqued the bill, and that those regulators had not received enough information from the utilities to vet cost projections for the bill.

“There was lots of concerns expressed in the press and everybody else about how this bill got here and what it did and whether the regulator was left out or not,” Beyer said on Monday.

House Bill 4036 would double Oregon’s existing mandate to increase renewable energy and require Portland General Electric and PacifiCorp to use renewable power sources such as wind and solar to serve at least 50 percent of their customers’ energy demand in Oregon by 2040, up from the current state mandate of 25 percent renewable energy by 2025.

The bill would also require the investor-owned utilities to stop using coal to serve Oregon customers, but there are questions about whether the bill would actually do much to impact the phase-out of coal power in Oregon. Portland General Electric has already committed to close Oregon’s only coal plant, in Boardman, by 2020, and Beyer said the bill would have a greater impact on the types of power utilities use to replace coal.

Beyer invited Susan Ackerman, chair of the Public Utility Commission, to testify before the committee on Monday, something Senate Republicans had called for last week.

Ackerman said the Public Utility Commission had long considered a carbon cap-and-trade system to be the most efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Lawmakers introduced a bill to create a cap-and-trade system this session, although it seems to have lost momentum and is assigned to the budget writing Joint Committee on Ways and Means.

Ackerman said she was concerned that if the renewable mandate bill passes, it could use up the political capital that would be necessary to pass cap-and-trade legislation.

Ackerman also used her testimony Monday to respond to respond to a news report that Brown’s administration had muzzled the Public Utility Commission.

“That is simply not the case,” Ackerman said.

Emails released by the Public Utility Commission showed Brown’s staff instructed the agency earlier this year not to go public with talking points they had prepared listing concerns about the bill, specifically that it would be expensive to consumers but do little to reduce carbon emissions. PacifiCorp has estimated the increased renewable energy mandate would cause its rates to increase by less than 1 percent annually, although critics have noted that estimate only went through 2030. Portland General Electric projected the bill’s costs through 2040 and estimated the legislation would cause rates to rise by an average of 1.5 percent annually.

The Capital Bureau is a collaboration between the Pamplin Media Group and the EO Media Group.

Source:  Written by Hillary Borrud/Capital Bureau | 23 February 2016 | portlandtribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.