LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Independent candidate slams Energy Minister over comments on wind energy 

Credit:  Donegal now | Friday 5th of February 2016 | www.donegalnow.com ~~

Independent General Election candidate, Cllr Niamh Kennedy, has slammed comments made by the Energy Minister, Alex White, about wind energy.

White spoke with the Irish Independent and said that “onshore wind has worked really well – are we going to close that down?”

Cllr Kennedy has responded and said, “Quite clearly all the evidence shows that wind energy is ineffective and a recently tweeted picture of Mr Brendan Halligan, a director of Mainstream Renewable Power with huge wind farm projects, opening a constituency office for Mr Alex White suggests at best a conflict of interests.”

She went on to call the row “whitewash” as “in reality the setback distance of 1km between turbines and towns and villages was not an issue since it was highly unlikely any such project was ever, or would ever, be applied for”.

She continued: “Minister White is trying to muddy the waters from the real issue and that is the setback distance between homes and turbines. It is three years since the Department of Environment promised an update on those antiquated 2006 guidelines which had no definite set back distance. These two Labour ministers are involved in an unedifying, trumped up row which has achieved the effect the outgoing government wanted – to put the thorny issue of setback from turbines off until after the general

Cllr Kennedy said the issue has “particular relevance” in Donegal, where there are almost 300mW of turbines in place and there are planning applications in place to bring in another 160mW.

She said, “At best Mr White proposes a mandatory setback of 600mtrs which means little change from the suggested figure of 500mtrs in 2006. At that time turbines were about one third the size of what is currently suggested for Carrickaduff in the Finn Valley where Ireland’s largest wind farm of 49 machines each 156mtrs high is being decided upon by An Bord Pleanala. Yet Donegal County Council voted to change its County Development Plan in 2014 to enshrine a ten times by turbine height setback distance from homes. This was done after a public consultation in which 98.4% of the respondents agreed with the proposal. Yet, Alan Kelly issued a shameful Section 31 Order overturning the Council’s properly mandated decision. People seem to have forgotten that.”

Cllr John Campbell sought permission from the High Court to challenge the legality of the Minister’s order to overthrow DCC’s Variation and was successful in securing a Judicial Review of the order.

She concluded: “After over a year of legal blocking that Judicial Review was to take place on 22nd January last but incredibly Minister Kelly’s barristers have managed yet another sleight of hand by insisting not enough Court time had been allocated to hear the case in January and an examination of the High Court schedules now sees the case pushed out until mid-June 2016. Somehow this is an appalling abuse of process – quite clearly, no more than revising the 2006 Wind Energy Guidelines, it did not suit Alan Kelly or this Government that this Judicial Review of the Donegal times setback Variation would take place before the election. If elected I promise to bring much pressure to bear on the incoming Minister of Environment to review Kelly’s order against DCC and to relinquish it long before the High Court review in June”

Source:  Donegal now | Friday 5th of February 2016 | www.donegalnow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky