| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
North Devon Council to decide whether to pay compensation to wind turbine complainant
Credit: North Devon Journal | February 02, 2016 | www.northdevonjournal.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
North Devon Council will this week decide whether or not to pay £100 to a man who complained about noise nuisance from a wind turbine near his house.
A complaint had been made to the Local Government Ombudsman by a man, whose details have not been released, claiming the council did not take “prompt and appropriate action” to address noise nuisance caused by a wind farm close to his home.
The man claimed he was caused “avoidable disturbance” and that his health was adversely affected as a result of the council’s inaction.
The Ombudsman did not agree with the complaint, saying the council had effectively dealt with negotiations with the wind farm operator to achieve a “positive outcome for all local residents”.
It said the council had:
• Been at fault when it decided to install monitoring equipment inside the complainant’s house, which was not appropriate. The Ombudsman said this implied the council was looking at noise disturbance in terms of a potential statutory nuisance which it was not. The Ombudsman believed this “unnecessarily raised the complainant’s expectations” of what the council would do.
• Been at fault when it lost the data collected during the monitoring at the complainant’s home. The council recognised in its report to the Ombudsman that losing the data caused the complainant a great deal of avoidable frustration (however explained how it would not have had any impact on how it dealt with the case).
• The Ombudsman said the loss of data caused the complainant to “waste avoidable time and effort pursuing the council about it and this was an avoidable injustice”.
The complaint is due to be discussed at a meeting of the council’s ethics committee tomorrow night (Wednesday).
The Ombudsman has recommended that the council apologises to the man in question, pays him £100 and put procedures in place to avoid the problems being repeated.
Members of the committee will have to decide whether to accept the recommendations or reject them and possibly incur an Ombudsman report criticising the council.
Check the Journal website for the outcome of the meeting.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=75828 ]
