[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Go to multi-category search »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Answers to Shirley Wind problems prove elusive  

Credit:  Doug Schneider, USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin | January 27, 2016 | www.greenbaypressgazette.com ~~

For Sarah Capelle, the decision was made when her four-month-old kept waking up in the middle of the night, screaming.

The boy’s agony, coupled with migraines and muscle spasms she was experiencing, convinced Capelle and her husband they needed to move away from the industrial wind turbine that towered over their Glenmore home.

“It got to the point where I could barely function,” said Capelle, whose family surrendered their home to the bank in order to move away from the turbines. “If this was a disease raging through the community, (you) would be all over it immediately. We can’t wait any longer for solutions!”

She was among the crowd of more than 60 people who jammed a meeting room – some spilling into a hallway – seeking solutions from the county’s Human Services Committee to health problems they are convinced were caused by low-frequency sound from the eight turbines of the Shirley Wind Farm. Affected residents pressed lawmakers to take action, and criticized Health Director Chua Xiong for her December decision that insufficient scientific evidence exists to blame the turbines for health problems.

Almost a dozen wore brightly colored shirts and held signs saying “I am the evidence” of people whose health has been affected.

But while the committee was sympathetic, they could not offer a solution after residents and Xiong spoke for almost three hours combined. Lawmakers suggested forming a task force, increasing pressure on the state to fund a study, and even suing the wind farm’s operator, but they ended their discussion without agreeing on a recommendation to take to the full board next month.

They also directed their frustration at the state Legislature, which removed $250,000 that Gov. Scott Walker had placed in his biennial budget to fund a study of possible links between turbines and ill health.

“If we’ve got to be upset with somebody,” said Supervisor Dan Robinson of De Pere, “we need to be upset with the state.”

Several residents, though, focused their frustrations on Xiong. Though the health director insisted she had used “a rigorous, scientific process” to reach her conclusion about turbines and health, a couple of people who live near the wind farm said she ignored some available scientific evidence.

In a comment that brought a rebuke from Robinson, Barbara Vanden Boogart accused Xiong of failing to protect citizens of the county.

“I expect her to stand and do what’s right. I expect her to protect these people,” said Vanden Boogart, an official of the group Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy. “There are children being harmed at this very minute! You should be outraged that these people will go home tonight and not sleep … and no one has the guts to do anything about it.”

The county’s next move is unclear. Executive Troy Streckenbach last week asked supervisors for support in asking the state to fund a study, but there’s no guarantee the state will do so.

Duke Energy Renewables, a North-Carolina company that operates Shirley Wind, has said repeatedly that sounds produced by the turbines cannot be linked to health problems. Electricity produced at the site can power about 6,000 homes and is sold to Wisconsin Public Service Co.

Source:  Doug Schneider, USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin | January 27, 2016 | www.greenbaypressgazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.