[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

£300,000 bill if wind farm appeals and wins again  

Credit:  Written by Emma Crichton | The Inverness Courier | 28/01/2016 | www.inverness-courier.co.uk ~~

Highland Council could find themselves hundreds of thousands of pounds out of pocket after blocking a controversial wind farm south of Inverness – if the company behind it decides to appeal the decision.

Councillors unanimously voted to reject the application for 13 turbines at Tom nan Clach, Glenferness, at a planning meeting on Tuesday despite applicants Nanclach already having permission to build 17 turbines at the site, which was granted by the Scottish Government on appeal in 2013.

The energy company is now considering appealing the decision again and if it is granted the council could be hit with the costs of up to £300,000.

If a planning applicant wins an appeal against a local authority they have a right to claim expenses. If granted, the council must cover the costs of both sides which usually amounts to between £200,000 and £300,000.

Nanclach lodged the second application as it wants to reduce the number of turbines from 17 to 13 but make them bigger, from 110m to 125m, and more spread out. The company claims this will increase the overall “energy yield” by 26 per cent.

This sparked an outcry of 161 objections including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and the John Muir Trust.

Nairn provost Laurie Fraser criticised the plans for his ward during the meeting.

“We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t,” he said. “We’re going to have a wind farm here whether we like it or not.”

But councillor Bill Lobban said comparing the two was like having permission to build a bungalow and erecting a four-storey building.

He added: “The original decision to refuse was the right decision. This change would make matters much worse.”

Infinergy, acting on behalf on Nanclach, said the company is considering
appealing the decision.

Esbjorn Wilmar, managing director of Infinergy, said: “This is an extremely disappointing decision by Highland Council. This redesign provides an opportunity to greatly increase the renewable electricity generated on the site. They (councillors) don’t seem to be interested in the slightest in the opportunity to generate more renewable energy from an already consented site.”

A spokeswoman for the company later added they could not rule out claiming against the council for appeal costs.

She said: “The combined cost of an appeal is between £200,000 and £300,000. Until now we have never claimed for costs because we believe it’s not a good thing to put that on the taxpayer.

“So far we never have but I can’t say for definite that we won’t.”

Source:  Written by Emma Crichton | The Inverness Courier | 28/01/2016 | www.inverness-courier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.